Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On Thursday, January 9, 2003 1:07 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, as I original proposed, httpd-2.2 will target APR 1.0. In
fact, httpd-2.2 won't even be released until APR hits that magic
number. All the old
--On Thursday, January 9, 2003 1:07 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, as I original proposed, httpd-2.2 will target APR 1.0. In
fact, httpd-2.2 won't even be released until APR hits that magic
number. All the old cruft deprecated over the development
--On Monday, January 13, 2003 6:52 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 2003/01/13 10:52:07
Modified:tables apr_hash.c
include apr_hash.h
Log:
A binary-safe patch that satisfies Jerenkrantz's original
desire for more elements, but structured such that we
Brian Pane wrote:
If we could change the apr_atomic_inc/dec functions to use
apr_uint32_t,
this part of the fdqueue code could become a lot simpler.
As far as I know, we can make it work with apr_uint32_t on most
platforms, as long as we declare any inline assembly blocks as
volatile (thanks to
At 12:35 PM 1/13/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
There are two votes in the STATUS that deserve some on list discussion.
* APACHE_2_0_BRANCH uses a level of APR code branched from the
APACHE_2_0_43 tag.
yes: trawick, jerenkrantz
no:wrowe
wrowe observes that we have
At 01:18 PM 1/13/2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, January 13, 2003 6:52 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 2003/01/13 10:52:07
Modified:tables apr_hash.c
include apr_hash.h
Log:
A binary-safe patch that satisfies Jerenkrantz's original
desire
