[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + * @remark The only reason that the apr_file_open_std* functions exist
> + * is that you may not always have a stderr/out/in on Windows.
>
Huh? I thought the reason these functions exist is that otherwise you'd
have no portable way of getting a standard i/o handle tha
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can live with that :)
>
> (yes, I'm psychologically damaged by some of the xyy specials that cutified
> something in APR but chopped off interesting Unix-specific code at the
> knees)
OK, i'm not sure what you're talking about with the "xyy
specials"
