Has there been any further discussion of this?
Anthony Howe
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 06:14 AM 2/5/2003, Anthony Howe wrote:
Please find enclosed a proposed solution for the bug I posted
last month:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16056
The source code comments in the patch s
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > something we can fix for APR 1.0/Apache 2.1-dev by making apr_off_t always
> > 64 bits whether native apr_off_t is 64 bits or not?
>
> Perhaps that might not be a bad idea, but it would make off_t usage that much
> worse on 32-bit processors and we'd have to downcast
[ Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
--On Friday, February 28, 2003 4:37 PM -0500 Jeff Trawick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (a) Why doesn't Apache automatically include largefile support?
> Performance reasons? Shouldn't there at least be an easy ./configure
> option to turn it on?
isn't there also t
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:37 PM 2/28/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>something we can fix for APR 1.0/Apache 2.1-dev by making apr_off_t
always 64 bits
+1
>whether native apr_off_t is 64 bits or not?
s/apr_off_t/off_t/ :-)
oops :) yes, of course that was the intention
could someone with access to apr.apache.org please update the doxygen
docs that are posted there? according to the timestamp on them they
were last updated on Nov 10 2002, and there have been a number of
changes since then.
-garrett
