APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/06/26 18:17:44 $]
Release:
0.9.3 : tagged March 30, 2003
0.9.2 : released March 22, 2003
0.9.1 : released September 11, 2002
0.9.0 : released August 28, 2002
APRUTIL LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/03/31 05:32:43 $]
Release:
0.9.3 : Tagged March 30, 2002
0.9.2 : Released March 22, 2002 (alpha)
0.9.1 : Released September 11, 2002 (alpha)
0.9.0 : Not released
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2003/11/06 01:18:22
Modified:.configure.in
Log:
* configure.in: Fix endianness detection with autoconf 2.1x.
Speaking of autoconf, I get this every time:
WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot'
WARNING: and
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:32:07PM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
Branko ibej wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
/* FIXME: this is not C99 or C++ or Java */
What's the matter? Did your editor break? :-)
Besides, your revision is wrong...
/* FIXME:
What is this and the APR_IS_BIGENDIAN macro used for? Do we have
any code that is endian-dependent?
-aaron
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:18:23AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2003/11/06 01:18:22
Modified:.configure.in
Log:
* configure.in: Fix endianness
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:27:57AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
What is this and the APR_IS_BIGENDIAN macro used for? Do we have
any code that is endian-dependent?
$ grep -l -r --include \*.c APR_IS_BIGENDIAN .
./random/unix/sha2.c
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:18:23AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 6, 2003, at 8:55 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:27:57AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
What is this and the APR_IS_BIGENDIAN macro used for? Do we have
any code that is endian-dependent?
$ grep -l -r --include \*.c APR_IS_BIGENDIAN .
./random/unix/sha2.c
Ah, I didn't pick up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 2003/11/06 08:26:09
Modified:random/unix apr_random.c
Log:
fix an odd portability issue:
Bit-field foo must be of type signed int, unsigned int or int.
Thanks.
BTW, on the subject of bitfield gotchas, never make boolean fields
signed -
Ben Laurie wrote:
BTW, on the subject of bitfield gotchas, never make boolean fields
signed - why? Coz:
struct x { signed int onebitfield:1; } x;
signed int someint;
x.onebitfield=TRUE;
someint=TRUE;
assert(x.onebitfield == someint); /* SPLAT!!! */
:)
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a issue with a linux box not having enough entropy and hanging
on a call to apr_uuid_get (as it calls /dev/random)
I was wondering why we don't just use /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid
and use that for our uuid?
If you are building APR yourself, I
10 matches
Mail list logo