The question was due to a typo in a hastily written description;
At 08:55 PM 1/8/2004, Donald Doane wrote:
>The following comment is from apr_lib.h:
>
> * apr_vformatter does not call out to any other code, it is entirely
> * self-contained. This allows the callers to do things which are
> * othe
At 02:31 PM 1/8/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>We're being sloppy with these... Shouldn't all FNM_* in
>httpd be using the APR versions? Just grepping for
>FNM_PERIOD...
I would think so ... patch on :)
>./modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c:
>FNM_NOESCAPE | FNM_PERIOD
Sorry Jeff,
you are right.
My code is:
void *
io_thread_main(void *arg)
{
apr_port_t num_porta;
apr_pool_t *context;
apr_socket_t *sock;
apr_size_t length;
apr_status_t stat;
apr_interval_time_t read_timeout;
apr_sockaddr_t *local_sa, *remote_sa;
char msgbuf[80];
char *re
Marco Spinetti wrote:
there is another information: really my fprint is outside if: so
apr_socket_send return APR_SUCCESS but the number of bytes written is 0.
Marco, you're not making this easy for us to help you. Please show the
real code your using, and check return codes from all APR functio
Marco Spinetti wrote:
I have update to latest CVS version, but the problem is still alive.
The only fixes were to the test programs, not to APR itself.
I have discovered that the problem isn't apr_socket_recv, but
apr_socket_send.
I call this function in this way:
.
length = strlen(p->query)
Well,
there is another information: really my fprint is outside if: so
apr_socket_send return APR_SUCCESS but the number of bytes written is 0.
Is it possible?
What could be the possible causes?
What could I do?
--Marco
Marco Spinetti wrote:
Hi
I have update to latest CVS version, but the proble
Hi
I have update to latest CVS version, but the problem is still alive.
I have discovered that the problem isn't apr_socket_recv, but
apr_socket_send.
I call this function in this way:
.
length = strlen(p->query) + 1;
if (apr_socket_send(sock, p->query, &length) != APR_SUCCESS) {
apr_s
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Has anyone made a move at releasing apr-0.9.5?
> I have a lot of FreeBSD users asking me for an apr-0.9.5
> release so that it can be added to the FreeBSD ports
> tree.
Arhhh.. yet another thing on my list of things to do yesterday. :-/
I'll atte
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 10:25:51AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Evan Easton wrote:
>
> > > We NEED BADLY separate apr-0.9.5 release for FreeBSD ports (for
> > > example, to allow build new subversion without apache).
> > > Please, please, release it!
> > >
> > Ditto that!
