On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Sometimes people report bugs and/or post patches on these lists and for
> whatever reason they are never properly addressed. Discussion on the list is
> great, but it is all too easy for the e-mails move out of sight. The mail
> arrives all too quickly.
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sometimes people report bugs and/or post patches on these lists and for
whatever reason they are never properly addressed. Discussion on the list is
great, but it is all too easy for the e-mails move out of sight. The mail
arrives all too
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:11:29AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Note that these lines now generate a gcc 3.2 warning for casting from a
> pointer to an integer of a different size (32 bits into 64 bits). But the
> Solaris API is such that you have to stuff a pointer to an integer.
>
> +
Joe Orton wrote:
Thanks, added that too with the configure check for sendfilev64. Take 3
is about ready to be committed, I think.
I can't imagine any showstoppers at this point. Committing real soon seems to
be the right thing to do.
TODO:
* test the sendfile thunks work
* adjust ssize_t rc han
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:14:43PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >Updated patch attached, thanks for the feedback so far...
> >
> >TODO:
> >
> >* hook up Solaris sendfilev64 if necessary
>
> looks necessary... dunno if there was a Solaris with sendfilev but no
> sendfilev64 suc
Sometimes people report bugs and/or post patches on these lists and for
whatever reason they are never properly addressed. Discussion on the list is
great, but it is all too easy for the e-mails move out of sight. The mail
arrives all too quickly. The best action you can take to avoid the bit
