Re: [PATCH] Re: setting LDFLAGS for apr build; won't be set in apr-config; why?

2004-03-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:51:34PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:25:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: here's a more concrete example apr HEAD RHEL 3.0 for PPC libtool 1.4.3 from system install CFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64" LDFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64 -Xlinker -melf64ppc"

Re: [PATCH] Re: setting LDFLAGS for apr build; won't be set in apr-config; why?

2004-03-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:25:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: here's a more concrete example apr HEAD RHEL 3.0 for PPC libtool 1.4.3 from system install CFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64" LDFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64 -Xlinker -melf64ppc" \ ./configure Isn't that equivalent to the simpler CC="g

Re: [PATCH] Re: setting LDFLAGS for apr build; won't be set in apr-config; why?

2004-03-30 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:51:34PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:25:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > here's a more concrete example > > > > apr HEAD > > RHEL 3.0 for PPC > > libtool 1.4.3 from system install > > > > CFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64" LDFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64 -Xlin

Re: [PATCH] Re: setting LDFLAGS for apr build; won't be set in apr-config; why?

2004-03-30 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:25:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > here's a more concrete example > > apr HEAD > RHEL 3.0 for PPC > libtool 1.4.3 from system install > > CFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64" LDFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64 -Xlinker -melf64ppc" \ > ./configure Isn't that equivalent to the simpler CC="

[PATCH] Re: setting LDFLAGS for apr build; won't be set in apr-config; why?

2004-03-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
here's a more concrete example apr HEAD RHEL 3.0 for PPC libtool 1.4.3 from system install CFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64" LDFLAGS="-Xcompiler -m64 -Xlinker -melf64ppc" \ ./configure it builds, test programs work, but apr-config just has -pthread for CFLAGS and nothing for LDFLAGS but in build/apr_rul

Re: cvs commit: apr-util/xlate xlate.c

2004-03-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 07:05:22AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jorton 2004/03/30 01:58:22 Modified:xlatexlate.c Log: * xlate/xlate.c (check_sbcs): Remove function which made unsafe assumptions (a theoretical issue), and was buggy in not resettin

Re: cvs commit: apr-util/xlate xlate.c

2004-03-30 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 07:05:22AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >jorton 2004/03/30 01:58:22 > > > > Modified:xlatexlate.c > > Log: > > * xlate/xlate.c (check_sbcs): Remove function which made unsafe > > assumptions (a theoretical issue), and was buggy in

Re: cvs commit: apr-util/xlate xlate.c

2004-03-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jorton 2004/03/30 01:58:22 Modified:xlatexlate.c Log: * xlate/xlate.c (check_sbcs): Remove function which made unsafe assumptions (a theoretical issue), and was buggy in not resetting the iconv handle on failure (the cause of at least one real issue).

apr-util HEAD make extraclean not cleaning up expat??

2004-03-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
(has anybody else seen this?)

Re: recursive apr_thread_rwlock_wrlock?

2004-03-30 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:22:20PM -0500, Marc M. Adkins wrote: > On Monday 29 March 2004 01:16 am, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:57:53PM -0500, Marc M. Adkins wrote: > > > Is it possible that apr_thread_rwlock_wrlock will allow recursive > > > behavior on Windows but not on Linux

Re: building APR on MinGW. On Win98

2004-03-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
If the platform resolves to win32 (building subset/win32/*.c) then we just need to trick it - win 32 has its own hardcode cases. Bill At 09:16 PM 3/29/2004, Greg Matheson wrote: >Has anyone built on MinGW? I want to use Subversion with >perl so I need the SWIG bindings and this requires building

Re: recursive apr_thread_rwlock_wrlock?

2004-03-30 Thread Marc M. Adkins
On Monday 29 March 2004 01:16 am, Joe Orton wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:57:53PM -0500, Marc M. Adkins wrote: > > Is it possible that apr_thread_rwlock_wrlock will allow recursive > > behavior on Windows but not on Linux? By this I mean that a specific > > thread will request a write lock a

building APR on MinGW. On Win98

2004-03-30 Thread Greg Matheson
Has anyone built on MinGW? I want to use Subversion with perl so I need the SWIG bindings and this requires building Subversion's redistribution of the APR. This fails for me on Win98 in configure, unable to to make a decision on shared memory. checking for mmap... no checking for munmap... n