At 07:28 AM 7/25/2004, Sander Striker wrote:
>> From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> If you (or anyone) can dig up a URL for the previous
>> discussion and reason for the objection, that would be
>> useful, too. A technical objection ("risk of something
>> breaking" or "less efficie
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
> From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 2:20 PM
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > I had, but there was objection against including it.
> > I can dig it up ofcourse.
>
> Yes please!
>
> If you (or anyone) can dig up a URL for the previous
> dis
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
> I had, but there was objection against including it.
> I can dig it up ofcourse.
Yes please!
If you (or anyone) can dig up a URL for the previous discussion and
reason for the objection, that would be useful, too. A technical
objection ("risk of some
> From: Branko Cibej [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 7:17 PM
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> >At 04:06 AM 7/24/2004, Nick Kew wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Is there some fundamental reason why there's no apr_prealloc()?
> >>
> >>[...] I can't help thinking this should be
>
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 09:05 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 02:41:07PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> > #elif defined(HAVE_EPOLL)
> > ev.events = get_epoll_event(descriptor->reqevents);
> > +ev.data.fd = pollset->nelts;
>
> Did you use data.fd for this rather than data.u32
