I'll be rolling without a change (which means our next chance to
touch this for apr 1.x will be Darwin 10)...
...unless you folk speak up quick.
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Is OS/X 10.5 - Darwin 9 our opportunity to build the usual dl API?
Since 10.5 has never built APR because of an
Henry Jen wrote:
Attached is a patch giving the -version-info, works for me.
However, I am not sure if this is enough, as in ccs/ces, the libtool
is called with -avoid-version, which makes me suspicious the version
is left out on purpose.
No - it wasn't thought out.
The avoid dodge is
FWIW - this is how apple built to 10.5's /usr/lib ...
... not that it's apropos of anything, we could care less if they don't
bother to submit patches.
;-)
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'll be rolling without a change (which means our next chance to
touch this for apr 1.x will be Darwin
On Nov 1, 2007 3:55 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW - this is how apple built to 10.5's /usr/lib ...
Huh?
% uname -mrsv
Darwin 9.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.0.0: Tue Oct 9 21:37:58 PDT
2007; root:xnu-1228~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh
% ls /usr/lib/*.dylib | wc -l
314
I
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Nov 1, 2007 3:55 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW - this is how apple built to 10.5's /usr/lib ...
Huh?
% uname -mrsv
Darwin 9.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.0.0: Tue Oct 9 21:37:58 PDT
2007; root:xnu-1228~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh
% ls
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And, APR trunk seems to work fine on 10.5 AFAICT - matching what Aaron
reported. So, I'm at a loss to even comment on the sendfile issue you
obliquely referred to. -- justin
Did you try 1.2.x? Nope. It's fine because I added an implementation of
sendfile, do
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We don't test sendfile by default. Within APR (trunk), simply...
$ cd test
$ make
$ ./sendfile server
$ ./sendfile client blocking
and you'll see how either the kernel library or the implementation (or
maybe even the test) is broken.
Or (and I should have seen
Before I backport, a quick glance is appreciated.
I don't have an itanium hpux box, can anyone confirm if
+ if test $ac_cv_sizeof_voidp$have_shl = 41; then
is a good test of a 32 (vs. 64 bit) build?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Nov 1 18:54:33 2007
New Revision:
Davi was just observing on irc that there are no APR-related submissions.
The CFP closes tomorrow, if anyone is interested in submitting a short
abstract (and then putting together the material in the next 6 mos).
If you are interested, jump over to http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
Considering how
