Subject asks it all, candidates are up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
for your reviewing pleasure... vote away;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr 1.3.1 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.1 as GA
Windows .zip's will follow when my head is above water and my sinuses clear up.
and based on raw gnu packages, not fedora's idea of a good schema.
Hit this one in our config...
configure.in:144: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before
AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS
../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:385: AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS is expanded from...
../../lib/autoconf/specific.
Henry Jen wrote:
Thanks for the correction, I apologize for the mistake.
No hassle, wanted to call it out for everyone since we have many new
committers. I see it was actually part 2 of the prior commit.
http://people.apache.org/~jorton/svn.merge
This is nice, thanks for the pointer.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/14/2008 10:20 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Please don't do this;
>>
>> ---
>> Revision 663845 - Directory Listing
>> Modified Fri Jun 6 07:39:52 2008 UTC (8 days, 12 hours ago) by henryjen
>>
>>
On 06/14/2008 10:42 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys, if anyone is looking at this, I'll hold off from tagging a bit
longer,
as I'd rather have apr-1.3.1 address all the platform quirks we identified
in preparing 2.2.9 for release. But if I hear nothing, I'll have to
just move ahead :)
On 06/14/2008 10:20 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please don't do this;
---
Revision 663845 - Directory Listing
Modified Fri Jun 6 07:39:52 2008 UTC (8 days, 12 hours ago) by henryjen
backport r663342 from trunk
---
Such commit messages aren't legible when comparing a branc
Guys, if anyone is looking at this, I'll hold off from tagging a bit longer,
as I'd rather have apr-1.3.1 address all the platform quirks we identified
in preparing 2.2.9 for release. But if I hear nothing, I'll have to just
move ahead :)
Bill
Paul Querna wrote:
On aurora.apache.org, shortl
Please don't do this;
---
Revision 663845 - Directory Listing
Modified Fri Jun 6 07:39:52 2008 UTC (8 days, 12 hours ago) by henryjen
backport r663342 from trunk
---
Such commit messages aren't legible when comparing a branch to trunk, please
repeat the purpose of the commit in
Tom Donovan wrote:
I'm guessing he probably missed something in his DBDParams, or else
MySQL wasn't running when he tested.
Possible. I just found it very quirky that this happens only in dso
mode, he seems to have an understanding of things (enough to delve into
how the linkages have change
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Looking over the patches, none seem to correspond to this gentleman's post
from over on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could anyone particularly familiar with mysql
take a quick look and perhaps come up with a few ideas? Seems that this
user has a perfectly working non-dso config
Looking over the patches, none seem to correspond to this gentleman's post
from over on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could anyone particularly familiar with mysql
take a quick look and perhaps come up with a few ideas? Seems that this
user has a perfectly working non-dso config which fails with our new
def
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Honestly, I loathe tabs as much as the next guy, but I actually
>> dislike the idea of wholesale reformatting because it makes it harder
>> to figure out where a bit of code
12 matches
Mail list logo
