Sander Temme said:
>
> On May 31, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:55 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
>>> #0 0x000103a7 in send0_pollset (tc=0xb508, data=0x0) at
>>> testpoll.c:389
>>
>> If you stop there and have a look at the vars, anything that GDB
>> doesn
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On May 31, 2009 5:11pm, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 05:21 -0700, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> FWIW, "make check" has been causing a system panic for me on at least
> 10.5.5-10.5.7. As Paul mentioned earlier (somewhere), this is
> triggered by our kqueue() use (which has no issue
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 05:21 -0700, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> FWIW, "make check" has been causing a system panic for me on at least
> 10.5.5-10.5.7. As Paul mentioned earlier (somewhere), this is
> triggered by our kqueue() use (which has no issues AFAICT on FreeBSD).
> I don't recall other people repo
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 09:15 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
> Looks like descs has not been filled in:
>
> (gdb) p descs
> $8 = (const apr_pollfd_t *) 0x0
>
> Should that be NULL after the poll?
Maybe you need to step into apr_pollset_poll() on line 384, to see what
happens to descs there. Looks like
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 05/31/2009 01:15 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> FYI - As soon as I see one more committer ack the 1.3 release, I will
>> move ahead with tagging an 0.9; I just figured it wasn't worth doing
>> if things were out of sorts.
>>
>> If anyone wants to address any 'make
On May 31, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:55 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
#0 0x000103a7 in send0_pollset (tc=0xb508, data=0x0) at
testpoll.c:389
If you stop there and have a look at the vars, anything that GDB
doesn't
like? Wrong alignment and such?
On May 31, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 03:08 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[+1] Release apr 1.3.4 as GA
[-1] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
--
$ ./testall -v testdbm
testdbm : |Line 175: expected <0>, but saw <20019>
FAIL
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 03:08 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> [+1] Release apr 1.3.4 as GA
> [-1] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
--
$ ./testall -v testdbm
testdbm : |Line 175: expected <0>, but saw <20019>
FAILED 1 of 2
Failed TestsTotal FailF
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On May 29, 2009, at 1:08 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> Candidates in the usual location, may take up to an hour to sync.
>> Letting this vote run through midnight Monday morning, my time,
>> so depending on my weekend I'll either sta
On 05/31/2009 11:07 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Saturday 30 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>>> On Friday 29 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
>>> apr-util's "make check" fails in testdbm because test/Makefile.in
>>> m
On 05/31/2009 01:15 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> FYI - As soon as I see one more committer ack the 1.3 release, I will
> move ahead with tagging an 0.9; I just figured it wasn't worth doing
> if things were out of sorts.
>
> If anyone wants to address any 'make check' flaw there, first, tha
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:55 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
> #0 0x000103a7 in send0_pollset (tc=0xb508, data=0x0) at
> testpoll.c:389
If you stop there and have a look at the vars, anything that GDB doesn't
like? Wrong alignment and such?
--
Bojan
On Saturday 30 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > On Friday 29 May 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >> [ ] Release apr-util 1.3.5 as GA
> >
> > apr-util's "make check" fails in testdbm because test/Makefile.in
> > misses ../dbm/.libs when setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH
14 matches
Mail list logo
