Re: state of the release candidate

2009-06-02 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 10:50 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > 1 from bojan, > jim and I'm a little confused why a not-a-regression test module flaw > would halt a release Practical reasons only. We already had fixes committed and it looked like APR was going to be re-rolled, so doing APU as wel

Re: svn commit: r781139 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/test/Makefile.in

2009-06-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > As you notice the original first commit to this problem went to apr/apr/trunk. I had missed that; thanks!

Re: [vote]

2009-06-02 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 2, 2009, at 2:27 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: svn mv apr/apr-util/trunk apr/apr-util/trunk-eol or svn rm apr/apr-util/trunk +1 ? Mostly curious about what else people might want to harvest from a trunk-eol before it's rm'ed. Aren't all the relevant bits in apr trunk now? S.

Re: svn commit: r781139 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/test/Makefile.in

2009-06-02 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/02/2009 11:09 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > rpl...@apache.org wrote: >> Modified: >> apr/apr-util/trunk/test/Makefile.in > > apr/apr-util/trunk is dead, see the now-combined apr/apr/trunk > I know, I know. See the excerpt from Rainers mail below for the rationale: > Although apr

[vote]

2009-06-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
svn mv apr/apr-util/trunk apr/apr-util/trunk-eol or svn rm apr/apr-util/trunk ? Mostly curious about what else people might want to harvest from a trunk-eol before it's rm'ed.

Re: svn commit: r781139 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/test/Makefile.in

2009-06-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
rpl...@apache.org wrote: > Modified: > apr/apr-util/trunk/test/Makefile.in apr/apr-util/trunk is dead, see the now-combined apr/apr/trunk

Re: svn commit: r780412 - /apr/apr-util/branches/1.3.x/test/Makefile.in

2009-06-02 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/02/2009 10:27 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi RĂ¼diger, > > On 31.05.2009 13:50, rpl...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: rpluem >> Date: Sun May 31 11:50:59 2009 >> New Revision: 780412 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=780412&view=rev >> Log: >> Merge r780410 from trunk: >> >> * Ensure t

Re: [PATCH] prevent "billion laughs" attack against expat

2009-06-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Joe Orton wrote: > http://milw0rm.com/exploits/8842 > > This should disable all entity expansions with expat and seems to work > correctly, though I haven't done extensive testing. Looks good, please commit for 1.3 and 0.9 since I'll roll both overnight. Bill > Index: xml/apr_xml.c > =

[PATCH] prevent "billion laughs" attack against expat

2009-06-02 Thread Joe Orton
http://milw0rm.com/exploits/8842 This should disable all entity expansions with expat and seems to work correctly, though I haven't done extensive testing. Index: xml/apr_xml.c === --- xml/apr_xml.c (revision 781032) +++ xml/a

Re: state of the release candidate

2009-06-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > For apr 1.3 we have +1's from ruidiger, bojan, jim, guenter, -1 from sander > for the darwin fault confirmed by jeff. At 120 hours into the release I'll > revert apr/poll to rev 1.3.3 and reroll, unless someone cares to offer the > appropriate changes to autoconf, bec

state of the release candidate

2009-06-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
For apr 1.3 we have +1's from ruidiger, bojan, jim, guenter, -1 from sander for the darwin fault confirmed by jeff. At 120 hours into the release I'll revert apr/poll to rev 1.3.3 and reroll, unless someone cares to offer the appropriate changes to autoconf, because I agree that introducing segfau

Re: svn commit: r780412 - /apr/apr-util/branches/1.3.x/test/Makefile.in

2009-06-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi RĂ¼diger, On 31.05.2009 13:50, rpl...@apache.org wrote: > Author: rpluem > Date: Sun May 31 11:50:59 2009 > New Revision: 780412 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=780412&view=rev > Log: > Merge r780410 from trunk: > > * Ensure that the in list in the for loop contains at least one argu