Jeff Trawick wrote:
My understanding: Each of these deleted entries thus far is a minor
implementation detail related to the new apr_crypto feature. As the
feature was never released, they do not fix a problem for the users of
our library. OTOH, any of these if tied to a particular user
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
My understanding: Each of these deleted entries thus far is a minor
implementation detail related to the new apr_crypto feature. As the
feature was never released, they do not fix a problem for the
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:14:54AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Including these details in CHANGES is unsustainable. CHANGES would be
completely unusable if these iterative fixes for new features were
included. The few people who need to know this kind of information
will have to get it from
All this is done and committed to trunk and 1.4... will backport
to 1.3 after some more testing and feedback... Still some issues
with TIME_FMT warnings
Hi,
I was just looking into the setenv / unsetenv stuff in APR, and found
that we assume that unsetenv doesnt have a return value on all
platforms. I have searched a bit, and found these:
http://linux.die.net/man/3/setenv
http://www.manpagez.com/man/3/unsetenv/
from that it seems that there are
On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:58:20PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Oct 13 13:58:19 2009
New Revision: 824767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=824767view=rev
Log:
More Darwin mojo due to 64 and 32 bit multi-arches. The
deal
On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I managed to get hold of someone at Apple who pointed me to the
following ed script that they run against apr.h to make it work with
Snow Leopard:
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/apr/apr-23/apr/files/fix-apr.h.ed
It would seem
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was just looking into the setenv / unsetenv stuff in APR, and found
that we assume that unsetenv doesnt have a return value on all
platforms. I have searched a bit, and found these:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was just looking into the setenv / unsetenv stuff in APR, and found
that we assume that unsetenv doesnt have a return value on all
platforms. I have searched a bit, and found these:
Hi,
Jonathan Leffler schrieb:
POSIX has a different view on the correct behaviour:
NAME
unsetenv - remove an environment variable
SYNOPSIS
|^[CX javascript:open_code('CX')] [Option Start] #include
stdlib.h
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
We certainly should not be making end user's lives more difficult for
the sake of saving a few bytes.
This is not about saving a few bytes. It is about getting needless
implementation details out
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:58:20PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Oct 13 13:58:19 2009
New Revision: 824767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=824767view=rev
Log:
More Darwin mojo due to 64 and 32 bit multi-arches. The
deal is we need to install
12 matches
Mail list logo
