OK, I tried this on my OpenSolaris box, and believe I figured out what
is going on.
The dead-lock happens when the initial one worker thread get into idle
first as no tasks are pushed yet, then two push comes in. Under this
circumstance, there is one thread idle, thus no new thread will be
created
2010/9/27 Jeff Trawick :
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
>> 2010/9/27 Nick Kew :
>>>
>
> (The next one is
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722, which has no
> patch. Maybe I can debug it.)
>
I have a quick glance at it, and I would like to make a note th
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> The submitter says make install bombs if APU_MODULES is empty, even
> after other fixes that made it work on Solaris.
testing with apr-1.4.x HEAD, an empty APU_MODULES causes that entire
target to be skipped. If I invoke the specific target
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
> 2010/9/27 Nick Kew :
>>
>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 13:12, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>> See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49709 and attached
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> The patch makes conceptual sense to me, though I haven't studied the
>>
2010/9/27 Nick Kew :
>
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 13:12, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49709 and attached
>> patch.
>>
>> The patch makes conceptual sense to me, though I haven't studied the
>> details. Perhaps someone has a head start on learning the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45276
The submitter says make install bombs if APU_MODULES is empty, even
after other fixes that made it work on Solaris.
The check in dso.m4 is already committed.
Supposedly the other fix in Makefile.in is required on AIX. (Is this
purely a she
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> Henry, do you follow this list? If no reply, maybe you (Jeff) should copy
> him your post.
>
I forwarded it to him off-line just in case. Thanks!
On 27 Sep 2010, at 13:12, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49709 and attached
> patch.
>
> The patch makes conceptual sense to me, though I haven't studied the details.
> Perhaps someone has a head start on learning the apr thread pool
> implementa
See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49709 and attached
patch.
The patch makes conceptual sense to me, though I haven't studied the
details. Perhaps someone has a head start on learning the apr thread pool
implementation?
