On 10/1/2010 8:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
> not yet available.
>
> Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
> some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours
> to release.
>
>
On 10/2/2010 4:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for
>>> Windows?
>>> (I don't think those are the .zip files created by the
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for
>> Windows?
>> (I don't think those are the .zip files created by the roll script)
>
> Actually, now they are. The svn e
On 01 Oct 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
not yet available.
Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours
to release.
+/-1
[
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
> not yet available.
>
> Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
> some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours
> to rel
On 02.10.2010 22:29, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
All builds suceeded, all make check ran fine, except for two cases on
Solaris 10 (Niagara). I reran the tests there and couldn't reproduce the
problem. Tests now running in a loop, so far not reproducib
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
> not yet available.
Windows files just now added...
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> All builds suceeded, all make check ran fine, except for two cases on
> Solaris 10 (Niagara). I reran the tests there and couldn't reproduce the
> problem. Tests now running in a loop, so far not reproducible.
...
> Details on Solaris 10 test f
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:22:29 -0400
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
> not yet available.
>
> Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
> some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours
> to
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
not yet available.
Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours
to release.
+/-1
[+1] Rel
On 01.10.2010 15:22, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
not yet available.
Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours
to release.
+/-1
[+1]
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 10/1/2010 10:47 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>>
>> would be nice if we could get an APR 1.4.x release too for next httpd
>> releases.
>
> Adapting to this set of changes for apu-0.9.x is far more important than
> dealing
> with apr. A
On 10/1/2010 10:47 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>
> would be nice if we could get an APR 1.4.x release too for next httpd
> releases.
Adapting to this set of changes for apu-0.9.x is far more important than dealing
with apr. A release would be nice, but is certainly not urgent.
13 matches
Mail list logo