Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/1/2010 8:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are > not yet available. > > Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect > some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours > to release. > >

Re: intent to T&R apr-util 1.3.10 sometime Thursday

2010-10-02 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/2/2010 4:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: >> On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for >>> Windows? >>> (I don't think those are the .zip files created by the

Re: intent to T&R apr-util 1.3.10 sometime Thursday

2010-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for >> Windows? >> (I don't think those are the .zip files created by the roll script) > > Actually, now they are.  The svn e

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Graham Leggett
On 01 Oct 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are not yet available. Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours to release. +/-1 [

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/.  Windows packages are > not yet available. > > Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect > some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours > to rel

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Rainer Jung
On 02.10.2010 22:29, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: All builds suceeded, all make check ran fine, except for two cases on Solaris 10 (Niagara). I reran the tests there and couldn't reproduce the problem. Tests now running in a loop, so far not reproducib

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/.  Windows packages are > not yet available. Windows files just now added...

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > All builds suceeded, all make check ran fine, except for two cases on > Solaris 10 (Niagara). I reran the tests there and couldn't reproduce the > problem. Tests now running in a loop, so far not reproducible. ... > Details on Solaris 10 test f

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:22:29 -0400 Jeff Trawick wrote: > Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are > not yet available. > > Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect > some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours > to

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are not yet available. Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours to release. +/-1 [+1] Rel

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Rainer Jung
On 01.10.2010 15:22, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are not yet available. Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours to release. +/-1 [+1]

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 10/1/2010 10:47 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: >> >> would be nice if we could get an APR 1.4.x release too for next httpd >> releases. > > Adapting to this set of changes for apu-0.9.x is far more important than > dealing > with apr.  A

Re: [vote] Release apr-util 1.3.10

2010-10-02 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/1/2010 10:47 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > > would be nice if we could get an APR 1.4.x release too for next httpd > releases. Adapting to this set of changes for apu-0.9.x is far more important than dealing with apr. A release would be nice, but is certainly not urgent.