moderated dev list a waste of time?

2010-11-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
As one of your humble list moderators for some time now, I've saved a few end users the minor aggravation, perhaps temporary, of subscribing before posting, and of course rejected hundreds upon hundreds of spam messages. The number of messages mistakenly accepted to the list (I'm not saying I did

Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?

2010-11-02 Thread Nick Kew
On 2 Nov 2010, at 13:48, Jeff Trawick wrote: I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a subscription before posting. Thanks for moderating. But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription. --

Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?

2010-11-02 Thread Wes Garland
+1 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote: On 2 Nov 2010, at 13:48, Jeff Trawick wrote: I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a subscription before posting. Thanks for

Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?

2010-11-02 Thread Eric Covener
Thanks for moderating. But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription. +1

Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?

2010-11-02 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 09:48 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: require a subscription before posting +1 -- Bojan