Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] %lld support in apr_snprintf()

2011-03-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:13 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> On 12/17/2010 7:32 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] %lld support in apr_snprintf()

2011-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:13 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >>> On 12/17/2010 7:32 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: While amending the apr.h file after the fact is obviously no

[PATCH] apr_strftime bugs/oddities

2011-03-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
The patch for APR trunk * supposedly fixes bugs interpreting the apr_snprintf() retcode on Windows (untested) * adds a test for short input buffer (tested on Unix, anticipated different retcode on Windows supposedly handled) * adds weasel words to the apr_strftime() documentation since Windows has

Re: APR Iconv License conditions

2011-03-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Holger Grandy wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that - although APR ICONV is made available under Apache License > 2.0 according to the website, NOTICE and LICENSE files - the source code > contains license headers using a modified BSD-style license (e.g. > apr_iconv.h)