+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
I was the last to TR 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
to maintain the branch. But that's just me.
Does anyone else have any intentions to release 1.3.x, or otherwise
believe that there is a need? (Günther?)
Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
I was the last to TR 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
to maintain the branch. But that's just me.
Does anyone else have any intentions to release 1.3.x, or otherwise
Am 27.03.2011 16:32, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:57 AM,fua...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fuankg
Date: Sun Mar 27 13:57:28 2011
New Revision: 1085937
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085937view=rev
Log:
Set APR_HAS_OS_UUID=1 for Windows builds.
trunk
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 16:32, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:57 AM,fua...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fuankg
Date: Sun Mar 27 13:57:28 2011
New Revision: 1085937
URL:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
I was the last to TR 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
to maintain the branch. But that's just
On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
I was the last to TR 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
to maintain the branch. But that's just me.
Does anyone
Jeff,
can you please take a look at this commit and verify this is what you
suggested, and that I did it right? If ok, should I proceed and apply
all these to build/apr_hints.m4 across all branches?
Gün.
Am 27.03.2011 18:24, schrieb fua...@apache.org:
Author: fuankg
Date: Sun Mar 27
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff,
can you please take a look at this commit and verify this is what you
suggested, and that I did it right? If ok, should I proceed and apply all
these to build/apr_hints.m4 across all branches?
looks good here; go
I was just looking at this part again (BZ#50146):
#ifdef APR_WANT_IOVEC
#if APR_HAVE_IOVEC
#if APR_HAVE_SYS_UIO_H
#include sys/uio.h
#endif
#else
struct iovec
{
void *iov_base;
size_t iov_len;
};
#endif
/* apr_want is included at several layers; redefining APR_HAVE_IOVEC
* now to
On 3/27/2011 11:50 AM, fua...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fuankg
Date: Sun Mar 27 16:50:30 2011
New Revision: 1085985
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085985view=rev
Log:
Fixed mingw platform identifier to catch all cross compilers.
+++ apr/apr/trunk/configure.in Sun Mar 27 16:50:30
On 3/27/2011 12:14 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
I dont believe this fixes BZ#50146, but I think its better this way ...
It's certainly cleaner.
Am 27.03.2011 23:36, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 3/27/2011 11:50 AM, fua...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fuankg
Date: Sun Mar 27 16:50:30 2011
New Revision: 1085985
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085985view=rev
Log:
Fixed mingw platform identifier to catch all cross compilers.
+++
13 matches
Mail list logo
