Build patch for APR

2011-05-15 Thread Igor Galić
Hi folks, here's a patch for APR's build system (trunk) so that httpd won't need a complete source tree to find it, but will be happy with an installed version. rjung looked over my shoulder, so I'm fairly certain the list of files is now complete. So long, i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 8

Re: Automatic builds for apr

2011-05-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 5/15/2011 11:44 PM, Igor Galić wrote: > > I went ahead and opened up an INFRA ticket > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3637 > > I volunteer to help infra with the setup of the build > and the dependencies. > > The final goal is to consume the successful apr and > apr-util build

Re: planning to T&R apr-util 1.3.11 later today

2011-05-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 5/15/2011 11:36 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 16 May 2011, at 12:15 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >>> All the changes in your laundry list that hadn't already been done on trunk >>> have now been >>> applied to trunk, most specifically the reordering of the parameters and >>> the removal

Automatic builds for apr

2011-05-15 Thread Igor Galić
Hey folks, We discussed getting automatic builds for httpd at the Apache retreat this weekend, and as essence realized that a very good first start would be to have APR in buildbot first and see how that goes. My experience from Traffic Server is that it goes actually very well, so after discuss

Re: planning to T&R apr-util 1.3.11 later today

2011-05-15 Thread Graham Leggett
On 16 May 2011, at 12:15 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: All the changes in your laundry list that hadn't already been done on trunk have now been applied to trunk, most specifically the reordering of the parameters and the removal of apr_crypto_t where apr_crypto_block_t was already present i

Re: planning to T&R apr-util 1.3.11 later today

2011-05-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 5/15/2011 3:33 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 15 Apr 2011, at 3:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> Guessing you are catching up on list traffic sequentially and you'll note >> that >> Jeff clarified this wasn't about apr-util 1.4 at all. Presuming we want some >> apr-util 1.4/1.5, I'll ge

Re: planning to T&R apr-util 1.3.11 later today

2011-05-15 Thread Graham Leggett
On 15 Apr 2011, at 3:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Guessing you are catching up on list traffic sequentially and you'll note that Jeff clarified this wasn't about apr-util 1.4 at all. Presuming we want some apr-util 1.4/1.5, I'll get the review done shortly against *trunk* anticipating

Re: Adding gcc attributes to function declarations

2011-05-15 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Stefan Fritsch wrote: I think it would be a good idea to add some more gcc attribute annotations to our header to mark parameters that must not be NULL, etc. We already have some of these for format string. In order to not break other compilers, I thought to just include

Adding gcc attributes to function declarations

2011-05-15 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, I think it would be a good idea to add some more gcc attribute annotations to our header to mark parameters that must not be NULL, etc. We already have some of these for format string. In order to not break other compilers, I thought to just include #if !defined(__GNUC__) #define __attri

Bug report for APR [2011/05/15]

2011-05-15 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned