Re: aprmemcache question

2012-09-27 Thread Joshua Marantz
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl wrote: If dlsym() is called with the special handle NULL, it is interpreted as a reference to the executable or shared object from which the call is being made. Thus a shared object can reference its own symbols. And

Re: aprmemcache question

2012-09-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com wrote: Thanks Ben, That might be an interesting hack to try, although I wonder whether some of our friends running mod_pagespeed on FreeBSD might run

Re: aprmemcache question

2012-09-27 Thread Joshua Marantz
That one call-site is HTTP_24/src/modules/cache/mod_socache_memcache.c, right? That was where I stole my args from. As the TCP/IP layer is a lower level abstraction than bathe apr_memcache interface, I'm still not clear on exactly what that means. Does a value of 600 mean that a single multiget

Re: aprmemcache question

2012-09-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com wrote: That one call-site is HTTP_24/src/modules/cache/mod_socache_memcache.c, right? That was where I stole my args from. no, subversion As the TCP/IP layer is a lower level abstraction than bathe apr_memcache interface,

Re: aprmemcache question

2012-09-27 Thread Joshua Marantz
This helps a lot. I think 600 seconds seems like a fine idle-reap timeout. I need to investigate why some lookups take a second or more. Maybe there's a mutex contention on my end somewhere. Thanks! -Josh On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep