Thanks for reply, I got it. Now the problem is my APIs does not expose
apr_pool_t to user like apr, so my APIs are not thread safe.
Best Regards
Chunwei Liu
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of Philip Martin
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013
On 30.05.2013 11:32, Joe Orton wrote:
> Does r1487796 (et al) work OK for you guys?
Yes, OK now on all my test platforms (Linux 32 and 64 Bits, Solaris 8
and 10 Sparc).
Thanks a bunch.
Rainer
I guess we just need the FreeBSD ARM fixes committed and then we can try
for 1.4.8 over the weekend...
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> >>> Does r1487796 (et al) work OK for you guys?
> >>
> >> Mine are failing on IPV6. I was a bit confused earlier on.
>
> I swore I saw a
>>> Does r1487796 (et al) work OK for you guys?
>>
>> Mine are failing on IPV6. I was a bit confused earlier on.
I swore I saw and even logged IPV6 as failing last night, but couldn't
reproduce a problem there this morning.
On AIX and Solaris/AMD64 pre-r1487796 IPv4 was failing. Works after r148
triple-sigh. I am retesting to be sure.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Our errors on
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 03:12:20PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> > I've
Our errors on
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 03:12:20PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> > I've got an issue AIX where the test added prior to
>> >
>> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&re
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 03:12:20PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> > I've got an issue AIX where the test added prior to
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1309386
> >
> > Works before r1309386 but not after (EINVAL). Wi
TROY.LIU 劉春偉 writes:
> In our practice, we found two threads get same address returned by
> apr_palloc. It will happen about one hour later after our server
> starts. We are using apr 1.4.5, the issue still exists in the
> latest subversion.
>From apr_pools.h:
* Note that most operati
