I'm concerned that you've made a specific assumption of 2's compliment int.
Nothing in the spec or real world assures us of this. Intel x86 is 2's
compliment, but this is a bad assumption.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 17:33 Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:28 AM, wrote:
> >
> > @@
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:28 AM, wrote:
>
> @@ -387,18 +389,20 @@ APR_DECLARE(char *) apr_ltoa(apr_pool_t
> char *buf = apr_palloc(p, BUFFER_SIZE);
> char *start = buf + BUFFER_SIZE - 1;
> int negative;
> +unsigned int un;
unsigned long for ltoa?
> if (n < 0) {
>
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-x64-macosx-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-x64-macosx-trunk/builds/131
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-macosx-dgvrs
Build Reason: The
