On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:49 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 00:43, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:31 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm a bit surprised that _WIN32_WCE used CreateThread() while more
>> > recent ones use _beginthreadex(), shouldn't i
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 00:43, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:31 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > I'm a bit surprised that _WIN32_WCE used CreateThread() while more
> > recent ones use _beginthreadex(), shouldn't it be the opposite?
> > CreateThread() aligns more with the usua
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:32 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:44 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > My bad, re-reading the thread the proposal was a compat apu_ -> apr_
> > layer in APR *util* 1.7.x, yet since apr-util 1.7.0 is released
> > already it would be the same kind o
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:44 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>
> My bad, re-reading the thread the proposal was a compat apu_ -> apr_
> layer in APR *util* 1.7.x, yet since apr-util 1.7.0 is released
> already it would be the same kind of compat issue.
No worries. The larger question is about whether to
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 17:39, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 18:19, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 23:37, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/13/22 7:04 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> > [[ sorry for delayed response ]]
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 17:33, Yann
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:37 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:56 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:50 AM Eric Covener wrote:
> > >
> > > > Code that will compile on 1.7.1 release
> > > > still won't compile on 1.7.0, unless I misunderstand something
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:56 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:50 AM Eric Covener wrote:
> >
> > > Code that will compile on 1.7.1 release
> > > still won't compile on 1.7.0, unless I misunderstand something.
> >
> > Is it a requirement in this direction?
> > https://apr.a
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:50 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> > Code that will compile on 1.7.1 release
> > still won't compile on 1.7.0, unless I misunderstand something.
>
> Is it a requirement in this direction?
> https://apr.apache.org/versioning.html says "later versions"
That's why I raise the qu
> Code that will compile on 1.7.1 release
> still won't compile on 1.7.0, unless I misunderstand something.
Is it a requirement in this direction?
https://apr.apache.org/versioning.html says "later versions"
I agree this ticks the ABI compatibility box.
I doesn't check the API compatibility box, IMO. Code that will compile
on 1.7.1 release
still won't compile on 1.7.0, unless I misunderstand something.
I'd really like us to start on the 1.7 releases today, but I'd have to
vote against this
candidate.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 18:19, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 23:37, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/13/22 7:04 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> > [[ sorry for delayed response ]]
>> >
>> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 17:33, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Ivan,
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jan 7
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 01:00, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 5:42 PM wrote:
> >
> > Author: ivan
> > Date: Wed Jan 19 16:41:59 2022
> > New Revision: 1897208
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1897208&view=rev
> > Log:
> > On 'win32-pollset-wakeup-no-file-socket-emulatio
12 matches
Mail list logo