On Wed, 22 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Realize that this is a HUGE shortcoming for Win32, and functionality
that
we need addressed for Windows. With no fork() implementation
whatsoever,
we need to be able to pass fd's (apr_socket_t's, apr_file_t's and many
other
low level objects) bet
Hello --
I _could_ use named pipes, in theory, to do a portable
many-client-to-one-daemon solution. The AGONIZING complexity comes in,
though, when you think about three simultaneous clients, all sending in
data in nine separate bursts and expecting six separate bursts from the
server daemon -- tr
Hello --
According to the API posted in
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:50:07 -0800
From: Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(which is the last mention I can find in the dev@apr.apache.org archives),
the apr_spipe_t looks _great_ for parent-child IPC, but is in no way m
