On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
> > (And even with my patch to APR, I still get a
> > warning, about not being able to load libsvn_ra_local.so, every time I
> > do anything with the client. Maybe my patch should throw away the error
> > instead of printing it?)
>
> Hmm? What is printing th
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Hmm... I basically rewrote that part, so, I believe it's my fault...
>
> Yes, you're right, without the default error handlers, the baby exits (but
> this is not a problem in Apache 2.0 as DSO modules are required to be there
> at s
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:44:05AM -0700, David Mankin wrote:
>...
> I configured and built svn with the --enable-maintainer-mode and
> --disable-shared.
>...
> However, I think there might also be a bug (or several) in Subversion.
> I compiled with --disable-shared, and yet subversion is still try
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:44:05AM -0700, David Mankin wrote:
> >
> > This weekend I tried to bootstrap subversion from the r1868 tarball.
> > However, I ran into a Mac OS X related stopper. Every time I tried to
> > run svn to checkout the reposito
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:44:05AM -0700, David Mankin wrote:
>
> This weekend I tried to bootstrap subversion from the r1868 tarball.
> However, I ran into a Mac OS X related stopper. Every time I tried to
> run svn to checkout the repository, it exited with this error:
>
> dyld: svn can't open
At 12:22 PM 06/10/2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
My code should better check for errors :) that's for sure, but at
the same time, they shouldn't be trying to load libraries randomly
if the files do not exist :) :) :)
On Windows, LoadLibrary will search all directories in PATH, the
current working d
"Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
>> Now, the question is _why_ that thing is called and why libsvn_ra_local.so
>> does not exist (if shared is disabled, it should be compiled in, right?)...
>
> I was under the impression that it was one of
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Now, the question is _why_ that thing is called and why libsvn_ra_local.so
> does not exist (if shared is disabled, it should be compiled in, right?)...
I was under the impression that it was one of those things of SVN
attempting to load all extensions
; -David Mankin
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 01:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Mankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [APR PATCH] Bootstrapping problem on Mac OS X
>
>
> This weekend I tried to bootstra
44:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Mankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [APR PATCH] Bootstrapping problem on Mac OS X
This weekend I tried to bootstrap subversion from the r1868 tarball.
However, I ran into a Mac OS X related stopper. Every time I tried to
run svn to c
10 matches
Mail list logo
