At 12:46 PM 10/20/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 11:30:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Maybe APR_APPEND needs to be cheap/simple append a la stdio append: we
seek to the end of the file at open time and forget about it after
that.
Then we need new APR_WRITE_AT_END or
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 11:30:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Maybe APR_APPEND needs to be cheap/simple append a la stdio append: we
seek to the end of the file at open time and forget about it after
that.
Then we need new APR_WRITE_AT_END or something better named which is
the expensive
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 11:30:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Maybe APR_APPEND needs to be cheap/simple append a la stdio append: we
seek to the end of the file at open time and forget about it after
that.
Then we need new APR_WRITE_AT_END or
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Why do we need to call SetFilePointer to each call of apr_file_write()? In
the common case where only threads in a single process write to a file,
calling SetFilePointer is a waste of cycles. If threads from multiple
processes are writing to a file,
