Ok, let's try this again. Due to problems in the 1.2.3 release
tarballs (they didn't compile on win32) I've rolled us up some 1.2.4
releases.
The only difference between these tarballs and the previous ones are
the version numbers, fixing the win32 compile issue, and a win32
specific bug fix + te
On 1/29/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, let's try this again. Due to problems in the 1.2.3 release
> tarballs (they didn't compile on win32) I've rolled us up some 1.2.4
> releases.
(Oh, and as usual, they're available at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/)
-garrett
On 1/30/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 -1 -0 for release:
> [X] [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.4
> [ ] [ ] [X] apr-util-1.2.4
apr-util won't build on AIX* with native compiler; needs
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/apr-util/trunk/dbd/apr_dbd.c?rev=330141&r1=321236&r2=330141&diff
Jeff Trawick wrote:
apr-util won't build on AIX* with native compiler; needs
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/apr-util/trunk/dbd/apr_dbd.c?rev=330141&r1=321236&r2=330141&diff_format=h
EWWW! Why not simply pass a function with the proper args and retval,
instead of casting this to heck?
On 1/30/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > apr-util won't build on AIX* with native compiler; needs
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/apr-util/trunk/dbd/apr_dbd.c?rev=330141&r1=321236&r2=330141&diff_format=h
>
> EWWW! Why not simply pass a
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 1/30/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
apr-util won't build on AIX* with native compiler; needs
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/apr-util/trunk/dbd/apr_dbd.c?rev=330141&r1=321236&r2=330141&diff_format=h
EWWW! Why not simp
