Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > On 08 Dec 2011, at 12:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > There's a parameter on release.sh which gets passed to apr-util > > buildconf. If it is not passed to release.sh it looks like it will > > look in ../apr. > > > > As it is not coming from the autotools, I guess

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 08 Dec 2011, at 12:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> There's a parameter on release.sh which gets passed to apr-util >> buildconf.  If it is not passed to release.sh it looks like it will >> look in ../apr. >> >> As it is not coming from the

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Rainer Jung
On 07.12.2011 23:56, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 07.12.2011 18:10, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggettwrote: diff -ru apr-util-1.3.12/build/config.guess apr-util-1.4.0/build/config.guess config.guess is no

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Graham Leggett
On 08 Dec 2011, at 12:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > There's a parameter on release.sh which gets passed to apr-util > buildconf. If it is not passed to release.sh it looks like it will > look in ../apr. > > As it is not coming from the autotools, I guess Graham would have to > look for where it m

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 07.12.2011 18:10, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggett  wrote: > > >> diff -ru apr-util-1.3.12/build/config.guess >> apr-util-1.4.0/build/config.guess > > > config.guess is not an autotool. Cool. (It wasn

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Rainer Jung
On 07.12.2011 18:10, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: diff -ru apr-util-1.3.12/build/config.guess apr-util-1.4.0/build/config.guess config.guess is not an autotool. apr-util buildconf should copy the file in from the apr against which you run build

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/7/2011 9:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > I am far more comfortable choosing a set of autotools shipped with and > supported by a major distribution than trying to cook up my own combination - > Redhat have already found an option that works, and if it isn't broken, I > don't believe we s

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 07 Dec 2011, at 8:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> The "People build APR" part is irrelevant.  The versions of autoconf >> and libtool used so far are anything but arbitrary.  They are known to >> work for APR users on a variety of platform

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Graham Leggett
On 07 Dec 2011, at 8:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > The "People build APR" part is irrelevant. The versions of autoconf > and libtool used so far are anything but arbitrary. They are known to > work for APR users on a variety of platforms. You're throwing away > fixes we have been shipping with f

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> Using the same autoconf and libtool as before should cost you less >> than 10 minutes, it makes it trivial to review more of the proposed >> tarball, and it essentially guarantees no regre

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Graham Leggett
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Using the same autoconf and libtool as before should cost you less > than 10 minutes, it makes it trivial to review more of the proposed > tarball, and it essentially guarantees no regressions in certain > aspects of the release. > > What could be

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> stuff to consider before 1.4.1 >> >> different autotools versions compared with 1.3.12?  (not always a >> problem, but could lead to unintended glitches???) >> >> I've been using autoconf

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Graham Leggett
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > stuff to consider before 1.4.1 > > different autotools versions compared with 1.3.12? (not always a > problem, but could lead to unintended glitches???) > > I've been using autoconf 2.64 and libtool 1.5.26 The autotools used are the defaults th

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. > > New in apr-util v1.4 is the apr_crypto interface, and a fix for LDAP on > Solaris. Full CHANGES are here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.0/CH

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 12/07/2011 12:39 AM, Igor Galić wrote: - Original Message - -0.5 non-binding of course Seems the purpose was to get apr_crypto. On Windows it's not built, even with APU_HAVE_CRYPTO set to 1 since apr_crypto.c is not included in the project for either static lib or dll. Once that i

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > -0.5 non-binding of course > Seems the purpose was to get apr_crypto. On Windows it's not built, > even > with APU_HAVE_CRYPTO set to 1 since apr_crypto.c is not included in > the > project for either static lib or dll. > > Once that is done, I'm getting this; > >

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 12/06/2011 01:57 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 12/06/2011 02:23 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. +/-1 [+1] Release apr-util 1.4.0 as GA Signatures OK Tested on Linux and Winows I'm changing my vote to -1 since windows crypto API is broke

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Gregg L. Smith
-0.5 non-binding of course Seems the purpose was to get apr_crypto. On Windows it's not built, even with APU_HAVE_CRYPTO set to 1 since apr_crypto.c is not included in the project for either static lib or dll. Once that is done, I'm getting this; Compiling... apr_crypto.c .\crypto\apr_crypto

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > Hi all, > > Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. > > New in apr-util v1.4 is the apr_crypto interface, and a fix for LDAP > on Solaris. Full CHANGES are here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.0/CHANGES Signatures look go

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1: Fed14, CentOS 5&6, OSX 10.7 (Xcode 4.2.1) On Dec 5, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. > > New in apr-util v1.4 is the apr_crypto interface, and a fix for LDAP on > Solaris. Full CHANGES are here: > https://svn.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 12/06/2011 02:23 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. +/-1 [+1] Release apr-util 1.4.0 as GA Signatures OK Tested on Linux and Winows Regards -- ^TM

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-06 Thread Graham Leggett
On 06 Dec 2011, at 3:23 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > [ X ] Release apr-util 1.4.0 as GA +1. Build clean and all tests pass on Centos6, FC17, and MacOSX 10.6. Regards, Graham --

[VOTE] Release apr-util 1.4.0

2011-12-05 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. New in apr-util v1.4 is the apr_crypto interface, and a fix for LDAP on Solaris. Full CHANGES are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.0/CHANGES +/-1 [ ] Release apr-util 1.4.0 as GA Regards, Graham -