Re: releasing 1.5.1 (was: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0)

2012-09-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 4, 2012, at 4:05 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Wednesday 22 August 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> The code exists already in a licensable form as part of the spec, I >> believe. >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3492#appendix-C >> >> This can be made more usable with pools, etc

releasing 1.5.1 (was: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0)

2012-09-04 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Wednesday 22 August 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > The code exists already in a licensable form as part of the spec, I > believe. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3492#appendix-C > > This can be made more usable with pools, etc with a pretty trivial > effort. Before I start, though, Fr

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-09-04 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Wednesday 08 August 2012, Gregg Smith wrote: > 1 warning > crypt_blowfish.c > .\crypto\crypt_blowfish.c(894) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion > from 'unsigned long' to 'char', possible loss of data That's a false positive. "count" can only be between 4 and 31 at this point. IMHO the compiler

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-22 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 8/22/2012 10:12 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] >> Sent: zondag 12 augustus 2012 19:40 >> To: dev@apr.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0 >> >>

RE: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-22 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Sent: zondag 12 augustus 2012 19:40 > To: dev@apr.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0 > > On 8/10/2012 1:05 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > Thanks for the detailed

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 8/10/2012 1:05 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Thanks for the detailed tests. > > On Friday 10 August 2012, Rainer Jung wrote: >> If you don't need to release before, I would like to fix the LDADD >> use over the weekend, but it is not a show stopper. > > It seems I will be busy in the next few da

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.08.2012 22:05, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Thanks for the detailed tests. On Friday 10 August 2012, Rainer Jung wrote: If you don't need to release before, I would like to fix the LDADD use over the weekend, but it is not a show stopper. It seems I will be busy in the next few days. It is unl

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-10 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Thanks for the detailed tests. On Friday 10 August 2012, Rainer Jung wrote: > If you don't need to release before, I would like to fix the LDADD > use over the weekend, but it is not a show stopper. It seems I will be busy in the next few days. It is unlikely that I T&R 1.5.1 before next Wednesd

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-10 Thread Rainer Jung
My test results: All problems are no regressions from 1.4.1. Summary === - some libtool m4 files not deleted by buildconf (see below) - crypto configure for OpenSSL at least fails on Solaris, because when linking against the libssl we need the additional flags "-ldl -lsocket -lnsl".

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-09 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Please include fix for bug #53684 in APR-Util 1.5.1. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-08 Thread Gregg Smith
On 8/7/2012 12:49 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Jeff Trawick wrote: But if somebody else with a platform that is not Linux, AIX, Netware, or Windows wants to do some testing first, that would be appreciated. Maybe Solaris or FreeBSD, anyone? BTW, did anyone test on Window

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> But if somebody else with a platform that is not Linux, AIX, Netware, >> or Windows wants to do some testing first, that would be appreciated. >> Maybe Solaris or FreeBSD, anyone? > > solaris/sparc32 passed 100% HP/IA64 looks okay, failure in

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Eric Covener
> But if somebody else with a platform that is not Linux, AIX, Netware, > or Windows wants to do some testing first, that would be appreciated. > Maybe Solaris or FreeBSD, anyone? solaris/sparc32 passed 100%

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:58 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2012-08-07 21:09, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >>> On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch >>> wrote: > Hi, > > Tarballs/z

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:58 PM, olli hauer wrote: > On 2012-08-07 21:09, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch >> wrote: Hi, Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ It in

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread olli hauer
On 2012-08-07 21:09, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch > wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> It includes many bug fixes and new built-in bcrypt support. >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > But if somebody else with a platform that is not Linux, AIX, > > Netware, or Windows wants to do some testing first, that would > > be appreciated. Maybe Solaris or FreeBSD, anyone? > > BTW, did anyone test on Windows yet? Gregg and Steffen have

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch > wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> > >> > It includes many bug fixes and new built-in bcryp

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch > wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> > >> > It includes many bug fixes and new built-in bcryp

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > > > It includes many bug fixes and new built-in bcrypt support. > > > > Full CHANGES are here: > > http://apr.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > It includes many bug fixes and new built-in bcrypt support. > > Full CHANGES are here: > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5 > > +/-1 > [ ] Release apr-uti

[VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

2012-08-06 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ It includes many bug fixes and new built-in bcrypt support. Full CHANGES are here: http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5 +/-1 [ ] Release apr-util 1.5.0 as GA