Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-04 Thread Greg Lazar
apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM On 3 April 2013 21:03, Greg Lazar wrote: The apr_file_lock routine, in the version of apr runtime library that I've currently built uses fnctl which does not appear to be thread safe. I need t

Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-04 Thread thomas bonfort
On 3 April 2013 21:03, Greg Lazar wrote: > ** > The apr_file_lock routine, in the version of apr runtime library that I've > currently built uses fnctl which does not appear to be thread safe. I need > to use the worker MPM, so is it recommended that I build the apr runtime > library to use flock

Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013, Philip Martin wrote: > Ben Reser > writes: > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Trawick > > > > wrote: > >> I'm not aware of any apr_file_lock() use within httpd, so you wouldn't > >> regress anything (unless you're using third-party modules that use > >> apr_f

Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-03 Thread Philip Martin
Ben Reser writes: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> I'm not aware of any apr_file_lock() use within httpd, so you wouldn't >> regress anything (unless you're using third-party modules that use >> apr_file_lock). But I guess you've introduced a third-party module that >>

Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-03 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > I'm not aware of any apr_file_lock() use within httpd, so you wouldn't > regress anything (unless you're using third-party modules that use > apr_file_lock). But I guess you've introduced a third-party module that > uses apr_file_lock() or yo

Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-03 Thread Greg Lazar
zar Cc: APR Developer List Subject: Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Greg Lazar wrote: The apr_file_lock routine, in the version of apr runtime library that I've currently built uses fnctl which does not appear to be thre

Re: Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Greg Lazar wrote: > ** > The apr_file_lock routine, in the version of apr runtime library that I've > currently built uses fnctl which does not appear to be thread safe. I need > to use the worker MPM, so is it recommended that I build the apr runtime > library to

Building the apr runtime library appropriately for the worker MPM

2013-04-03 Thread Greg Lazar
The apr_file_lock routine, in the version of apr runtime library that I've currently built uses fnctl which does not appear to be thread safe. I need to use the worker MPM, so is it recommended that I build the apr runtime library to use flock instead. NFS file systems aren't a concern in this c