On Feb 23, 2004, at 11:11 PM, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Scott Lamb wrote:
significant difference between them. In transferring either big or
small files with httpd-2.0 HEAD and ab over loopback on Darwin
(keepalive on). Which I'd think would be the ideal situation for
seeing
an imp
At 01:33 PM 2/23/2004, Scott Lamb wrote:
>On some older versions of platforms (Linux 2.2), these #defines exist but do
>not work - it's not possible to set them. Can I assume that if APR is built
>with a kernel in which it does work (Linux 2.4), it will be run with one as
>well? Or should I inc
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Scott Lamb wrote:
> significant difference between them. In transferring either big or
> small files with httpd-2.0 HEAD and ab over loopback on Darwin
> (keepalive on). Which I'd think would be the ideal situation for seeing
> an improvement...
Neither ab nor loopback make f
On Feb 23, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:33:31PM -0600, Scott Lamb wrote:
I'm putting together a patch to use SO_(RCV|SND)TIMEO for
apr_socket_timeout where available; I expect I'll find it has better
performance on some platforms, as it would no longer require usin
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:33:31PM -0600, Scott Lamb wrote:
> I'm putting together a patch to use SO_(RCV|SND)TIMEO for
> apr_socket_timeout where available; I expect I'll find it has better
> performance on some platforms, as it would no longer require using
> non-blocking IO and preceding ever
I'm putting together a patch to use SO_(RCV|SND)TIMEO for
apr_socket_timeout where available; I expect I'll find it has better
performance on some platforms, as it would no longer require using
non-blocking IO and preceding every read() and write() with a select().
(I intend to try benchmarking
