On 5/11/2011 7:39 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/misc/win32/misc.c?r1=892177&r2=892176&pathrev=892177
>
> BTW, who did that one :)
Bugger :) Why, I have no idea, but it was spawned by someone elses
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 9:23 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>
Running myapp.exe against libapr-2-0.dll can result in a myapp.exe.###
droplet that looks like this:
75B3 0001 1774 LoadLibraryA() misc/win32/misc.c:175
>
> T
On 5/11/2011 4:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Should I have meant to? Apparently Not!! I read the comment and not
> the header file.
:)
> I'll suggest a better fix separately.
Coolio :) I expect it's nothing more than dropping the #include and marking
up with more commentary.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 9:23 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>
Running myapp.exe against libapr-2-0.dll can result in a myapp.exe.###
droplet that looks like this:
75B3 0001 1774 LoadLibraryA() misc/win32/misc.c:175
>
> T
On 5/11/2011 9:23 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>> Running myapp.exe against libapr-2-0.dll can result in a myapp.exe.###
>>> droplet that looks like this:
>>>
>>> 75B3 0001 1774 LoadLibraryA() misc/win32/misc.c:175
This affects httpd 2.2.18, released. One per pid each time httpd is lau
On 5/11/2011 8:35 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 14:54
>> To: dev@apr.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: MinGW status
>>
>> Oh, how could I forget :)
>>
>> Running myapp.exe against libapr-2-0.dll can
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 14:54
>> To: dev@apr.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: MinGW status
>>
>> Oh, how could I forget :)
>>
>> Running myapp.exe against libap
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 14:54
> To: dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MinGW status
>
> Oh, how could I forget :)
>
> Running myapp.exe against libapr-2-0.dll can result in a myapp.exe.###
> droplet that looks li
