nd 64-bit (where available)
We are currently using CVS, but are planning to migrate to SVN
We use Cmake on all *NIX platforms
/Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Paul Querna [mailto:p...@querna.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:03 AM
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Platform Support in AP
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be
> removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be
> rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different
> implementations, I would prefer to just
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Wes Garland wrote:
> Paul, did you actually mean to collect votes for various UNIX platforms, or
> to deprecated things like Netware, BeOS, and OS/2?
Yes, in the end I wanted to see if anyone actually cares about
Netware, BeOS, or OS/2.
I suspect the answer is no
Paul, did you actually mean to collect votes for various UNIX platforms, or
to deprecated things like Netware, BeOS, and OS/2?
As you likely know, maintaining support for, say, Solaris 8 is probably
about as hard as maintaining support for AIX and sure shouldn't be disabled
were that the case. Ni
Paul Querna wrote:
I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be
removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be
rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different
implementations, I would prefer to just remove them if no one wants to
keep thing
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> I am personally willing to develop for:
> - FreeBSD >= 7.0-release
Mac OS X 10.5+. -- justin
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> Please respond with the Platforms you as a /developer/ are willing to
> support in APR-2.x.
Supporting os390 here.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
On 26 Mar 2009, at 10:03, Paul Querna wrote:
I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be
removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be
rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different
implementations, I would prefer to just remove them i
Paul Querna wrote:
I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be
removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be
rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different
implementations, I would prefer to just remove them if no one wants to
keep thing
I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be
removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be
rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different
implementations, I would prefer to just remove them if no one wants to
keep things up in sync.
Please
10 matches
Mail list logo
