Oh... summary of what I said: Ryan's approach is the right one for now. If
somebody wants to spend some time formalizing APR's release process, then go
for it.
Cheers,
-g
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:58:11PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:04:16PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
> >
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:04:16PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Ben Hyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Hyde wrote:
> > > > > APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y.
> > > >
> > > > I find this weird
> >
> > still
> [...]
> > > as easy as possib
Ben Hyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Hyde wrote:
> > > > APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y.
> > >
> > > I find this weird
>
> still
[...]
> > as easy as possible.
>
> it's weird for tags in apr to named after user's projects.
[...]
> mean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Hyde wrote:
> > > APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y.
> >
> > I find this weird
still
> The problem I am trying to solve,
hear hear
> as easy as possible.
it's weird for tags in apr to named after user's projects.
> kept a copy of the
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Hyde wrote:
>
> > Those tags should be in a format like
> > APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y.
>
> I find this weird. Library providers are not supposed to know such
> things about thier clients. It's the job the clients to record what
> version of the library they are de
> Those tags should be in a format like
> APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y.
I find this weird. Library providers are not supposed to know such
things about thier clients. It's the job the clients to record what
version of the library they are dependent upon. Surely this tag is just
an attempt to
On 12 Feb 2001, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I would like to suggest that ANY project with a committer on the list can
> > > tag the tree at any time. Those tags should be in a format like
> > > APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y. When APR releases a tarball, we w
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would like to suggest that ANY project with a committer on the list can
> > tag the tree at any time. Those tags should be in a format like
> > APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y. When APR releases a tarball, we will use
> > APR_X_Y, which will allow peopl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I would like to suggest that ANY project with a committer on the list can
> tag the tree at any time. Those tags should be in a format like
> APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y. When APR releases a tarball, we will use
> APR_X_Y, which will allow people to easily distinguis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I would like to suggest that ANY project with a committer on the list can
> tag the tree at any time. Those tags should be in a format like
> APACHE_2_0 or SUBVERSION_X_Y. When APR releases a tarball, we will use
> APR_X_Y, which will allow people to easily distinguis
One of the things that I have been doing a lot recently, is tagging the
tree with APACHE_2_0_* tags. This is because Apache 2.0 is trying to hit
beta, and we are rolling a lot of trees. Apache 2.0 needs our builds to
be reproducable, and I am sure every other project does too. I figure
there ar
11 matches
Mail list logo