apr
and was thread safe.
Don't the pools use mutexing already, is this platform specific?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Querna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:09 AM
To: Joe Orton
Cc: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Pollset: Thread Safe & More
On
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:08:59AM -0600, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:38 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > So I'm worried this patch is really solving the problem in the wrong
> > place. The thing you are exporting here in the APR API, "is the
> > apr_pollset_* interface thread-safe in
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:38 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> So I'm worried this patch is really solving the problem in the wrong
> place. The thing you are exporting here in the APR API, "is the
> apr_pollset_* interface thread-safe in _add and _remove", seems really
> horrible. Either an API is thread
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:38 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 08:57:24PM -0600, Paul Querna wrote:
> > Attached is a Patch for apr_pollset_*.
> > Changes Include:
> > - Replace HAS_* with USE_* to remove some complex #ifdef stuff.
> > - Partially thread safe (*)
> > - Removes the l
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 08:57:24PM -0600, Paul Querna wrote:
> Attached is a Patch for apr_pollset_*.
> Changes Include:
> - Replace HAS_* with USE_* to remove some complex #ifdef stuff.
> - Partially thread safe (*)
> - Removes the limitation on the number of sockets that you can add to a
> polls
Attached is a Patch for apr_pollset_*.
Changes Include:
- Replace HAS_* with USE_* to remove some complex #ifdef stuff.
- Partially thread safe (*)
- Removes the limitation on the number of sockets that you can add to a
pollset (**)
* The patch allows multiple threads to concurrently call _add()
