On 12/04/2009 05:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
I see good responses to the list from Branko, Joe and Jeff (and thanks
for the bugfix Branko), so I'll proceed with this tonight, we'll have
>
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> Hi,
>> William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
>>> I see good responses to the list from Branko, Joe and Jeff (and thanks
>>> for the bugfix Branko), so I'll proceed with this tonight, we'll have
>>> the usual 72hr vote, and then let's start this discussion
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi,
> William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
>> I see good responses to the list from Branko, Joe and Jeff (and thanks
>> for the bugfix Branko), so I'll proceed with this tonight, we'll have
>> the usual 72hr vote, and then let's start this discussion over about
>> the much larger cha
Hi,
William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
I see good responses to the list from Branko, Joe and Jeff (and thanks
for the bugfix Branko), so I'll proceed with this tonight, we'll have
the usual 72hr vote, and then let's start this discussion over about
the much larger changes in apr-util 1.4 ;)
I think we
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Please review the attached delta of apr 1.3 to 1.4 changes and
> chime in if you believe we are ready to tag 1.4. I suspect we are.
I see good responses to the list from Branko, Joe and Jeff (and thanks
for the bugfix Branko), so I'll proceed with this ton
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:01 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Please review the attached delta of apr 1.3 to 1.4 changes and
> chime in if you believe we are ready to tag 1.4. I suspect we are.
+1
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:01:34AM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> Please review the attached delta of apr 1.3 to 1.4 changes and
> chime in if you believe we are ready to tag 1.4. I suspect we are.
Looks good here!
Regards, Joe
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Please review the attached delta of apr 1.3 to 1.4 changes and
> chime in if you believe we are ready to tag 1.4. I suspect we are.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Since there were no objections to the original trunk commit and
responses to my pings on-list, I merged r8
Folks,
Please review the attached delta of apr 1.3 to 1.4 changes and
chime in if you believe we are ready to tag 1.4. I suspect we are.
Thanks!
Bill
Index: apr_poll.h
===
--- apr_poll.h (.../1.3.x/include) (revision 885682)
+
