Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 05:16:13AM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>>Joe Orton wrote:
>>
>>>How will this be used to replace the apr_generate_random_bytes
>>>interface, or is this just to be used to implement a daemon accessed via
>>>the EGD interface (or something like that)?
>>
>>
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 05:16:13AM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> > How will this be used to replace the apr_generate_random_bytes
> > interface, or is this just to be used to implement a daemon accessed via
> > the EGD interface (or something like that)?
>
> The latter is the gener
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:52:41PM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>>Ben Laurie wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Comments?
>>>
>>>Note that this supplies the underlying PRNG - I anticipate wrapping it
>>>up in a daemon for normal use. As discussed with some members of the
>>>team, we think that shou
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>> Bill Stoddard wrote:
>>
>>> Does Aaron Gifford have the rights to all the code submitted under his
>>> copyright?
>>
>> I have no idea. Feel free to ask.
>
> Since you are an APR PMC member and are about to commit the code to an
> APR repository, isn
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:52:41PM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> > Comments?
> >
> > Note that this supplies the underlying PRNG - I anticipate wrapping it
> > up in a daemon for normal use. As discussed with some members of the
> > team, we think that should be a sub-project o
Ben Laurie wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Does Aaron Gifford have the rights to all the code submitted under his
copyright?
I have no idea. Feel free to ask.
Since you are an APR PMC member and are about to commit the code to an
APR repository, isn't the task of vetting the code your responsibility?
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Does Aaron Gifford have the rights to all the code submitted under his
> copyright?
I have no idea. Feel free to ask.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
do
Does Aaron Gifford have the rights to all the code submitted under his
copyright?
Bill
David Reid wrote:
>
> +1 - commit that sucker :)
>
> Once it's in the tree then we can look at the thread safe issues :)
>
Agreed. :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
> From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:58 AM
> +1 - commit that sucker :)
>
> Once it's in the tree then we can look at the thread safe issues :)
Very true. And bottom line, I don't understand how a
PRNG works, and in short the patch. I know we need a
+1 - commit that sucker :)
Once it's in the tree then we can look at the thread safe issues :)
david
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> > Comments?
> >
> > Note that this supplies the underlying PRNG - I anticipate wrapping it
> > up in a daemon for normal use. As discussed with some members of the
> > tea
Ben Laurie wrote:
> Comments?
>
> Note that this supplies the underlying PRNG - I anticipate wrapping it
> up in a daemon for normal use. As discussed with some members of the
> team, we think that should be a sub-project of APR, apr-prngd.
>
> Note that for some applications, direct access to t
> From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:20 PM
> Comments?
Where's the patch?
> Note that this supplies the underlying PRNG - I anticipate wrapping it
> up in a daemon for normal use. As discussed with some members of the
> team, we think that should be
Comments?
Note that this supplies the underlying PRNG - I anticipate wrapping it
up in a daemon for normal use. As discussed with some members of the
team, we think that should be a sub-project of APR, apr-prngd.
Note that for some applications, direct access to the PRNG makes sense.
Also note th
14 matches
Mail list logo
