Re: [PATCH 2] worker MPM deadlock

2002-05-22 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:14:30PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > If it isn't guaranteed to do something but is rather just a "hint", that's > fine, as long as it's documented. But we should still make an attempt to > honor the hint if the underlying system will let us. > > [For example, I know my

RE: [PATCH 2] worker MPM deadlock

2002-05-22 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > You may be right but I would -hope- that a spec pthread implementation > > would handle pthread_yield() correctly... > > The problem is that Single Unix doesn't even define pthread_yield, and > neither does the pthreads spec if I am reading it right. It

RE: [PATCH 2] worker MPM deadlock

2002-05-22 Thread Ryan Bloom
Copying APR, because this is becoming an APR issue quickly. > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Is there a unix equivalent to the Win32 Sleep(0) call? If so, then > > we > > > can rip out all this > > > > cr