--On Sunday, December 29, 2002 4:49 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just add a couple of apr_sleep calls for a random period of
time. That should get the threads out of being run in serial,
shouldn't it?
As I said in my initial message, we tried that before and that
doesn't work. You ha
Why not just add a couple of apr_sleep calls for a random period of time.
That should get the threads out of being run in serial, shouldn't it?
Ryan
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Sunday, December 29, 2002 3:03 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > This highlights anothe
--On Sunday, December 29, 2002 3:03 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This highlights another problem with our test suite. We can't have
platform checks in our tests. Having these checks completely
invalidates the usefulness of APR. These kinds of checks are the
biggest reason that I haven't mig
At 05:03 PM 12/29/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 29 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> wrowe 2002/12/29 14:45:12
>>
>> Modified:test testatomic.c
>> Log:
>> No pthread_setconcurrency here on Darwin.
>>
>> Revision ChangesPath
>> 1.22 +1 -1 apr/test/
On 29 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wrowe 2002/12/29 14:45:12
>
> Modified:test testatomic.c
> Log:
> No pthread_setconcurrency here on Darwin.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.22 +1 -1 apr/test/testatomic.c
>
> Index: testatomic.c
> ===
On 2 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wrowe 2002/07/02 11:18:52
>
> Modified:test testatomic.c
> Log:
> We shouldn't presume any specific int sizes here, no?
>
> +apr_atomic_t oldval;
> +apr_atomic_t casval = 0;
This will fix some things and break others. ap
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have committed some changes but I am not happy...
Instead using cpp it would be better to use gcc directly:
gcc -Wa,-xarch=v8plus -D_ASM -D__STDC__=0 -c apr_atomic_sparc.S -o
apr_atomic_sparc.lo
what happens when people are using forte's compiler?
I have just to cha
Hi,
I have committed some changes but I am not happy...
Instead using cpp it would be better to use gcc directly:
gcc -Wa,-xarch=v8plus -D_ASM -D__STDC__=0 -c apr_atomic_sparc.S -o
apr_atomic_sparc.lo
I have just to change apr_atomic_sparc.s into apr_atomic_sparc.S. The native
solaris as accepts
Dale Ghent wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> | jean-frederic clere wrote:
> | > It works only with the native "as" but not with "gas".
> |
> | is this a problem on solaris?
> | doesn't every box come with 'as' out of the box?
>
> It doesnt install with the basic installation
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
| jean-frederic clere wrote:
| > It works only with the native "as" but not with "gas".
|
| is this a problem on solaris?
| doesn't every box come with 'as' out of the box?
It doesnt install with the basic installation scheme. The SUNWsprot and
SUNWbtool/SU
jean-frederic clere wrote:
It works only with the native "as" but not with "gas".
is this a problem on solaris?
doesn't every box come with 'as' out of the box?
I don't have the gnu-assembler installed on my solaris machines
if you think it gas on solaris support is needed can you supply me a
patc
It works only with the native "as" but not with "gas".
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> ianh02/02/19 15:45:06
>
> Modified:.configure.in
>atomic/solaris_sparc apr_atomic_sparc.s
>include apr_atomic.h
>test testatomic.c
> Lo
12 matches
Mail list logo
