RE: Win32 ordinal binding concerns

2000-12-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Jeff Trawick > > "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Bill and others interested, > > > > Please look at the current 2.0 library and executable binaries > > in the depends.exe utility. You will observe only one

Re: Win32 ordinal binding concerns

2000-12-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bill and others interested, > > Please look at the current 2.0 library and executable binaries > in the depends.exe utility. You will observe only one module is > bound by ordinal, and that is ws2_32.dll (which is a MS problem.) Is this to sa

Win32 ordinal binding concerns

2000-12-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Bill and others interested, Please look at the current 2.0 library and executable binaries in the depends.exe utility. You will observe only one module is bound by ordinal, and that is ws2_32.dll (which is a MS problem.) Bill