On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 1:08 PM Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> AFAIK if you want to build including crypto support, 1.7.x needs OpenSSL
> 1.0.2+. So if you need to stick to eg. 0.9.8, you are limited to 1.6.x.
> As we know, Apache httpd 2.4.x eg. still supports 0.9.8. So anyone
> building a recent 2.4.x u
AFAIK if you want to build including crypto support, 1.7.x needs OpenSSL
1.0.2+. So if you need to stick to eg. 0.9.8, you are limited to 1.6.x.
As we know, Apache httpd 2.4.x eg. still supports 0.9.8. So anyone
building a recent 2.4.x using the totally outdated 0.9.8 must use APU 1.6.x.
Conce
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 9:53 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> We have much activity on apr-util-1.7.0 but no release actions for
> some time now.
> There are very minor changes to 1.6.x branch.
>
> Do we want to release 1.7.0, or only a 1.6.x bump?
> Or do we want to do both? Are we ready and are t
On 18/09/2021 05:52, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
We have much activity on apr-util-1.7.0 but no release actions for
some time now.
There are very minor changes to 1.6.x branch.
Do we want to release 1.7.0, or only a 1.6.x bump?
Or do we want to do both? Are we ready and are the API changes
consid
We have much activity on apr-util-1.7.0 but no release actions for
some time now.
There are very minor changes to 1.6.x branch.
Do we want to release 1.7.0, or only a 1.6.x bump?
Or do we want to do both? Are we ready and are the API changes considered?
All observations and feedback on apr-util r
