Re: apr 1.3.x branch is dead, right?

2011-03-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick: >> I was the last to T&R 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release >> IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort >> to maintain the branch. But that's just me. >> >> Do

Re: apr 1.3.x branch is dead, right?

2011-03-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick: >> >> I was the last to T&R 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release >> IIRC.  I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort >> to maintain the branch.  But that's just me. >>

Re: apr 1.3.x branch is dead, right?

2011-03-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick: I was the last to T&R 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort to maintain the branch. But that's just me. Does anyone else have any intentions to release 1.3.x, or otherwise be

apr 1.3.x branch is dead, right?

2011-03-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
I was the last to T&R 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort to maintain the branch. But that's just me. Does anyone else have any intentions to release 1.3.x, or otherwise believe that there is a need? (Günther?)