On 12/12/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 08:42:29PM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On 12/9/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:07:20AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> >> We should first check whether the libtool developers inten
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 08:42:29PM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On 12/9/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:07:20AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> >> We should first check whether the libtool developers intentionally
> >> added that blank line; if they can fix
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:07:20AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> We should first check whether the libtool developers intentionally
> added that blank line; if they can fix the regression on their side,
> it means that the next stable version of libtool will work with older
> source tarballs of a
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:55:09PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
> > ===
> > testdso 5 4 80.00%
> > testpipe9 2 22.22%
>
>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:24:16PM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On 12/2/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >...
> >
> >Secondly, the APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED isn't working for me because the
> >default for the cross compiled size is 8. However, ssize_t for me is 4.
> >So, the
On 12/6/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:34:36PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > Secondly, the APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED isn't working for me because the
> > default for the cross compiled size is 8. Howev
On 12/2/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
...
Secondly, the APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED isn't working for me because the
default for the cross compiled size is 8. However, ssize_t for me is 4.
So, the configure fails. I made this change:
-APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED([#include ], ssize
Bob Rossi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:35:21PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Bob Rossi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Well, here is the compile command.
>>>
>>> /bin/sh
>>>
/home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools/apr/libtool
>>> --silent --mode=compile gcc -mno
On 12/6/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:30:55AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> The problem appears to be that libtool is now emitting a blank line
> before the line that contains the version string; try
>
> $ libtool --version 2>/dev/null | sed -e
> '/^$/d;s/(
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:35:21PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Bob Rossi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well, here is the compile command.
> >
> > /bin/sh
> > /home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools/apr/libtool
> > --silent --mode=compile gcc -mno-cygwin -g -O0 -DHA
Bob Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, here is the compile command.
>
> /bin/sh
> /home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools/apr/libtool
> --silent --mode=compile gcc -mno-cygwin -g -O0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I./include
> -I/home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigila
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:30:55AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> The problem appears to be that libtool is now emitting a blank line
> before the line that contains the version string; try
>
> $ libtool --version 2>/dev/null | sed -e
> '/^$/d;s/([^)]*)//g;s/^[^0-9]*//;s/[- ].*//g;q'
Works like
On 12/6/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:16:52AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> On 12/2/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >First, and oddly enough, the buildconf script fails for me because
> >build/buildcheck.sh doesn't recognize my libt
Hi,
Well, here is the compile command.
/bin/sh
/home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools/apr/libtool
--silent --mode=compile gcc -mno-cygwin -g -O0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I./include
-I/home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools
Bob Rossi wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick response. This is the output of my configure run.
> Is something obviously wrong here?
also - check that APR_HAS_DSO is 1.
If you force dlopen and dlsym to 0, see what happens.
dso/win32/dso.c, is the source we should be compiling, not the
dso/unix/dso.c. Can you check that?
Bob Rossi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:55:09PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> Failed TestsTotal FailFailed
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:55:09PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
> > ===
> > testdso 5 4 80.00%
> > testpipe9 2 22.22%
>
>
> Failed Tests Total FailFailed %
> ===
> testdso 5 4 80.00%
> testpipe 9 2 22.22%
testpipe errors are expected. Filesystem pipes on windows do not behave
in
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:16:52AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> On 12/2/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >First, and oddly enough, the buildconf script fails for me because
> >build/buildcheck.sh doesn't recognize my libtool --version. I don't know
> >sed well enough, a
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:34:36PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > Secondly, the APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED isn't working for me because the
> > default for the cross compiled size is 8. However, ssize_t for me is 4.
> > So, the configure fail
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Secondly, the APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED isn't working for me because the
> default for the cross compiled size is 8. However, ssize_t for me is 4.
> So, the configure fails. I made this change:
Can't you set ac_cv_sizeof_ssize_t=4 to get
Hi Bob,
On 12/2/06, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, and oddly enough, the buildconf script fails for me because
build/buildcheck.sh doesn't recognize my libtool --version. I don't know
sed well enough, and thought someone here would quickly be able to spot
the problem. If not, I'll
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've successfully cross compiled apr on cygwin to mingw. I've already
> had one patch go upstream to autoconf, which fixes a problem
> AC_CHECK_SIZEOF.
>
> I have two very small other problems, that need to be sent upstream, and
Hi,
I'm having trouble subscribing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've
sent a half dozen subscribe emails, and haven't been added yet.
(over several days) I've also sent emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and have received no response. Could someone please add me to this
mailing list?
I've successfully cross
24 matches
Mail list logo