++1, would you care to make it so :-?
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/unix mktemp.c
> On Mo
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:34:14PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> A question for the list - are we really working in microsecond resolutions?
> (Win32 is to the nearest 10 microseconds, I'm guessing others aren't that
> precise.) If so, what would you choose as a divisor, since we could certainly
>
A question for the list - are we really working in microsecond resolutions?
(Win32 is to the nearest 10 microseconds, I'm guessing others aren't that
precise.) If so, what would you choose as a divisor, since we could certainly
pick a better divisor than USEC_PER_SEC for randomness.
> wrowe
On 10 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -#ifdef APR_HAVE_STDINT_H
> +#if APR_HAVE_STDINT_H
Crap, I meant to fix that. Thanks, Brian.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
On 6 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jwoolley01/10/06 14:31:10
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
>file_io/unix mktemp.c
> Log:
> Many fixes to apr_file_mktemp when !HAVE_MKSTEMP to (a) make it work
> and (b) be consistent with systems that do have mkstemp.
>
>-
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:20:09PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2001 01:19 pm, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:44:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 September 2001 12:41 am, Greg Stein wrote:
> > >...
> > >
> > > > Those perms are incorrect. The A
On Monday 24 September 2001 01:19 pm, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:44:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2001 12:41 am, Greg Stein wrote:
> >...
> >
> > > Those perms are incorrect. The APR function takes different perms than
> > > the Unix functions. That sh
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:44:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2001 12:41 am, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> > Those perms are incorrect. The APR function takes different perms than the
> > Unix functions. That should be APR_UREAD|APR_UWRITE.
>...
> They didn't used to be different.
On Monday 24 September 2001 12:41 am, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:35:22AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > rbb 01/09/23 23:35:22
> >
> > Modified:.apr.dsp
> >file_io/unix mktemp.c
> > Log:
> > Use the mktemp.c file from unix on Windows
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:35:22AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rbb 01/09/23 23:35:22
>
> Modified:.apr.dsp
>file_io/unix mktemp.c
> Log:
> Use the mktemp.c file from unix on Windows as well. This requires
> making it use APR functions. This compi
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okey dokey. APR will formally provide apr_mkstemp() to apps, with
> prototype/doc in apr_file_io.h.
Boy am I scatterbrained today :( I take back what I said :)
I'll namespace protect it, but it won't be formally provided by APR as
an API. It doesn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > trawick 01/02/23 10:35:43
> >
> > Modified:file_io/unix mktemp.c
> > Log:
> > fix for ReliantUNIX and other platforms with no mkstemp() routine:
> >
> > Don't rename mkstemp(); locks/unix/crossproc.c assumes
On 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> trawick 01/02/23 10:35:43
>
> Modified:file_io/unix mktemp.c
> Log:
> fix for ReliantUNIX and other platforms with no mkstemp() routine:
>
> Don't rename mkstemp(); locks/unix/crossproc.c assumes that mkstemp() is the
> name of the functi
13 matches
Mail list logo
