On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:58:55PM -0800, Sander Striker wrote:
> > If the RELEASE_VERSION is an optional parameter (in which case the
> > script would try to figure out the name of the tarball based on the
> > TAG) what happens when the TAG does not contain a version? Does it
> > fail? Want to wri
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 15:51, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:19:42PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > --On Sunday, November 16, 2003 8:37 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >aaron 2003/11/16 12:37:07
> > >
> > > Modified:toolsrelease.sh
> > > Log:
> > >
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:19:42PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Sunday, November 16, 2003 8:37 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >aaron 2003/11/16 12:37:07
> >
> > Modified:toolsrelease.sh
> > Log:
> > It now takes a CVS TAG *and* a RELEASE_VERSION.
> >The TAG is
--On Sunday, November 16, 2003 8:37 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aaron 2003/11/16 12:37:07
Modified:toolsrelease.sh
Log:
It now takes a CVS TAG *and* a RELEASE_VERSION.
The TAG is what we pull from CVS.
The RELEASE_VERSION is what we call the tarball.
As I said in p
This is an initial whack at a release script. It seems to do the job, and
produce the right bits. I gotta run right now, but will test it further
tonite, then start the release process (mostly, more docs to put into the
apr-dist module).
If people would like to give this a run, then you can test i
