[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dreid 2004/03/09 09:57:35
Modified:.Makefile.in
Log:
This seems to have been lost in the changeover. If there is another
way of accomplishing this then I failed to find one and the code
in configure seems to point at this being a simple oversight
> Modified:.Makefile.in
> Log:
> aprutil in the "distribution" form does not want to remove configure or
> aprutils.exports (these two files are part of the distribution and users
> cannot typically regenerate them). But the developers' "extraclean" target
> will do i
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Modified:.Makefile.in
> > Log:
> > aprutil in the "distribution" form does not want to remove configure or
> > aprutils.exports (these two files are part of the distribution and users
> > cannot typically regenerate them).
> WHAT!?!?!?! Distclean is meant to bring us back to what we had when we
> did a "cvs checkout". If you just want to clean your directory use make
> clean, not make distclean. This is the exact same syntax and rules that
> Apache and APR have always used. AFAIK, this is basically a standard and
We have three levels of cleaning that need to be expressed:
1) clean out the .o files [before rebuilding]
2) clean out the results of running ./configure (restore everything to the
same point that you unpacked apache.org/dist/aprutil-1.0.tar.gz)
3) return to the point right after a CVS checkout
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 12:22:02AM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Modified:.Makefile.in
> > > Log:
> > > aprutil in the "distribution" form does not want to remove configure or
> > > aprutils.exports (these two files are p
> We have three levels of cleaning that need to be expressed:
>
> 1) clean out the .o files [before rebuilding]
> 2) clean out the results of running ./configure (restore everything to the
>same point that you unpacked apache.org/dist/aprutil-1.0.tar.gz)
> 3) return to the point right after a
> No, distclean means "clean the directories in preparation of a release."
> For example, the one for rsync does
>
>distclean: clean
> rm -f config.h config.cache config.status Makefile
>
> I have seen "reallyclean" used as a target to remove all generated
> files, but it isn't a sta
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:38:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > We have three levels of cleaning that need to be expressed:
> >
> > 1) clean out the .o files [before rebuilding]
> > 2) clean out the results of running ./configure (restore everything to the
> >same point that you unpa
> > > 1) clean out the .o files [before rebuilding]
> > > 2) clean out the results of running ./configure (restore everything to the
> > >same point that you unpacked apache.org/dist/aprutil-1.0.tar.gz)
> > > 3) return to the point right after a CVS checkout
> >
> > Step 2 does not exist in A
> > We have three levels of cleaning that need to be expressed:
> >
> > 1) clean out the .o files [before rebuilding]
> > 2) clean out the results of running ./configure (restore everything to the
> >same point that you unpacked apache.org/dist/aprutil-1.0.tar.gz)
> > 3) return to the point ri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> gstein 00/12/12 03:05:33
>
> Modified:.Makefile.in
> Log:
> auto-rebuild the exports file when a header changes
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.6 +14 -3 apr-util/Makefile.in
>
> Index: Makefile.in
> =
Cool. Thx!
-g
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:12:41PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> trawick 00/12/12 07:12:40
>
> Modified:.Makefile.in
> Log:
> Get rid of "-maxdepth 0" on the find invocation. This breaks on Tru64
> and FreeBSD, and I can't tell that it helps anyway.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Index: Makefile.in
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/Makefile.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.40
> retrieving revision 1.41
> diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41
> --- Makefile.in 2001/02/16 10:17:10 1.4
I've reversed those changes.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 03:35:18PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Index: Makefile.in
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/Makefile.in,v
> > retrieving revision 1.40
>
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 04:10:55PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> --- Makefile.in 2001/02/01 21:54:22 1.32
> +++ Makefile.in 2001/02/17 16:10:54 1.33
> @@ -55,3 +55,6 @@
>
>exports.c: $(EXPORT_FILES)
> (cat $(EXPORT_FILES) | ../build/buildexports.sh ..) >
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 04:10:55PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >...
> > --- Makefile.in 2001/02/01 21:54:22 1.32
> > +++ Makefile.in 2001/02/17 16:10:54 1.33
> > @@ -55,3 +55,6 @@
> >
> >exports.c: $(EXPORT_FILES)
> > (cat $(EXPORT_FILES)
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 04:10:55PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >...
> > --- Makefile.in 2001/02/01 21:54:22 1.32
> > +++ Makefile.in 2001/02/17 16:10:54 1.33
> > @@ -55,3 +55,6 @@
> >
> >exports.c: $(EXPORT_FILES)
> > (cat $(EXPORT_FILES)
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:34:44AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wrowe 01/01/17 20:34:44
>
> Modified:.STATUS
>.Makefile.in STATUS aprutil.dsp configure.in
> libaprutil.dsp
> Log:
> Upon a vote of 5 to 3 for eliminating
19 matches
Mail list logo
