Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Brian Havard
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:57:36 +0100 (CET), Sascha Schumann wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Brian Havard wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:17:16 -0800, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> >Yay! >> > >> >I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't >> >going to try and remove it, though

Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Brian Havard wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:17:16 -0800, Greg Stein wrote: > > >Yay! > > > >I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't > >going to try and remove it, though :-) > > Yeah, libtool has a few nice features. I just wish it didn't slow

Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Brian Havard
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:17:16 -0800, Greg Stein wrote: >Yay! > >I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't >going to try and remove it, though :-) Yeah, libtool has a few nice features. I just wish it didn't slow the build to a crawl. For me, APR now takes over 5x as l

Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Greg Stein
Yay! I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't going to try and remove it, though :-) Cheers, -g On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 01:01:33AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > bjh 01/01/09 17:01:33 > > Modified:.Makefile.in configure.in > Log: > Li