these, no? If not, I generally agree, however
you didn't look sideways with this proposal, for example,
strings/apr_strings.c:#ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H just to name one example.
And I also wouldn't agree with including process.h to every consumer of apr,
adding new system headers to apr.h needs strong
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 08.04.2011 17:45, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
process.h has a cute history
1.4.x:
APR_HAVE defined in apr.hw/apr.h.in; the include is performed in
apr.hw if defined
so apr.h.in needs to add the include if defined
