Re: svn commit: r1863234 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ include/apr_pools.h memory/unix/apr_pools.c

2022-06-29 Thread Rainer Jung
Thanks! Am 29.06.2022 um 17:01 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 4:41 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: This is the first commit which appeared to break APR in such a way that code compiled against apr 1.7.1 would be unable to run against apr 1.7.0 binaries. I think it has been reverte

Re: svn commit: r1863234 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ include/apr_pools.h memory/unix/apr_pools.c

2022-06-29 Thread Rainer Jung
Thanks, I will revert. Am 29.06.2022 um 16:40 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: This is the first commit which appeared to break APR in such a way that code compiled against apr 1.7.1 would be unable to run against apr 1.7.0 binaries. Thoughts, rjung? Are you willing to revert? This would persist on

Re: svn commit: r1863234 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ include/apr_pools.h memory/unix/apr_pools.c

2022-06-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 4:41 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > This is the first commit which appeared to break APR in such a way > that code compiled > against apr 1.7.1 would be unable to run against apr 1.7.0 binaries. I think it has been reverted already by http://svn.apache.org/r1902022 Regar

Re: svn commit: r1863234 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ include/apr_pools.h memory/unix/apr_pools.c

2022-06-29 Thread William A Rowe Jr
This is the first commit which appeared to break APR in such a way that code compiled against apr 1.7.1 would be unable to run against apr 1.7.0 binaries. Thoughts, rjung? Are you willing to revert? This would persist on apr 1.8.x for those interested in this new feature. On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at