[+1] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
My own belated vote for hpux (ansic) aix (vac) solaris (sunstudio c),
linux and windows.
Didn't like the noise from autoconf that we inherit in 2.62 nor the
breakage in the static util test on windows, and I'll be fixing the
On 06/17/2008 03:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
+/-1
[ +1 ] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[ +1 ] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
Passes all tests on the following platforms:
RHEL
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
Of course 1.3.1 images were scuttled, thanks to all who tested! Windows
.zip's will follow after a bit of
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
Ubuntu x86 2.6.24-19-generic
[+1] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
The only
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
Ubuntu x86 2.6.24-19-generic
[+1] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[+1] Release
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 18:44, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a release tarball, you shouldn't have to run buildconf, infact I'd say
its better not too -- we want to make sure the packagers generated
./configure works correctly.
I know this policy.
I first tested both apr and
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
Afterwards I ran ./buildconf to see whether some things run haywire
because of it. The only thing noteworthy was apr-util's ./buildconf
warning. All tests ran ok.
You mean the nested expat's ./buildconf warning ;-)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
A Cell Blade system: Linux 2.6.22-5.20070920bsc #1 SMP Tue Sep 25
10:49:16 CEST 2007 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64
Den Tuesday 17 June 2008 15:40:06 skrev William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
Of course 1.3.1 images were scuttled,
On 6/17/2008 at 7:40 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], William
A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 19:25, Lucian Adrian Grijincu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
A Cell Blade system: Linux
On 06/17/2008 06:25 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
A Cell Blade system: Linux 2.6.22-5.20070920bsc #1
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 22:11, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Cell Blade system: Linux 2.6.22-5.20070920bsc #1 SMP Tue Sep 25
10:49:16 CEST 2007 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux
[-1] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
-bash-3.2$ ./testall testlfs
testlfs : |Segmentation fault
On 06/17/2008 08:55 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 19:25, Lucian Adrian Grijincu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 22:24, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for investigating, but keep two things in mind:
1. If errno is really 0 it would be a bug in your glibc / Linux kernel
as the man page is very clear about setting an error code in errno here.
Yeah, but if it
On 06/17/2008 10:37 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 22:24, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for investigating, but keep two things in mind:
1. If errno is really 0 it would be a bug in your glibc / Linux kernel
as the man page is very clear about
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 00:53, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please execute the following command on your box and supply the output:
Never knew time could list so many things :)
/usr/bin/time --verbose sleep 0
Command being timed: sleep 0
User time (seconds): 0.00
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 00:57, Lucian Adrian Grijincu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 00:53, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please execute the following command on your box and supply the output:
Never knew time could list so many things :)
/usr/bin/time --verbose
On 06/17/2008 11:57 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 00:53, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please execute the following command on your box and supply the output:
Never knew time could list so many things :)
/usr/bin/time --verbose sleep 0
Command
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:04, Lucian Adrian Grijincu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 00:57, Lucian Adrian Grijincu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 00:53, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please execute the following command on your box and supply the
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 08:40 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+/-1
[+1] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
Good MD5s. Good signatures.
Fedora 9, i686/x86_64.
CentOS 5, i686/x86_64.
RHEL 4, i686.
CentOS 3, i686.
--
Bojan
Also, HP-UX 11.11, PA-RISC, in 32-bit mode, APR, compiled with GCC:
Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
===
testatomic 19 1 5.26%
testprocmutex 4 1 25.00%
testsockets 7
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Also, HP-UX 11.11, PA-RISC, in 32-bit mode, APR, compiled with GCC:
testsockets 7 3 42.86%
testsockets : |Line 70: expected 0, but saw 221
|Line 85: expected 0, but saw 221
|Line 112: expected 0, but saw 221
\Line 185: Condition is false,
23 matches
Mail list logo